Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580585›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Expectations of surgical residents for their residency training].

Anne Hendricks

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anne HendricksKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Uniklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland. hendricks_a@ukw.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe young generation of surgeons sets new requirements for educational and working conditions. This is frequently interpreted as a lack of motivation to perform; however, instead there is a claim for high-quality training with the aim of acquiring competence in the operative and perioperative setting as well as for responsible working time models.

objectiveAim of this article is to present expectations of surgical residents regarding residency training under current influencing factors, such as a high workload, the new training regulations or expected changes in the hospital landscape and to identify options for optimizing training and working conditions. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn addition to an extensive literature search, this article is based on published opinions and survey results as well as lectures and discussions at congresses held in the past year. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: To ensure a modern high-quality education and to maintain enthusiasm for surgery, the need for adjustments and innovation must be recognized and long-requested modifictions to established structures must be implemented. Flexible working models, the structured and transparent implementation of surgical residency training and modern training units, long-term planning of training curricula and new personnel structures with an expansion of teaching and feedback culture are options for improvement.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyCurriculumEducational StatusMotivationWorkloadEducational conceptsOperative trainingSurgical residency trainingSurgical residentsWorking conditions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.