ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[Expectations of surgical residents for their residency training].
Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Job satisfaction in trauma surgery and orthopedics-How do we perceive our roles? : State of the art based on job characteristic theory and an online survey among members of the German Society for Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Training of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residents in Virtual Surgical Planning: A Feasibility Study Comparing Open-Source Freeware and Commercially Available Software for Mandibular Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2025Article
- Challenges and opportunities in pediatric surgery training in Germany: a view from the trenches.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe young generation of surgeons sets new requirements for educational and working conditions. This is frequently interpreted as a lack of motivation to perform; however, instead there is a claim for high-quality training with the aim of acquiring competence in the operative and perioperative setting as well as for responsible working time models.
objectiveAim of this article is to present expectations of surgical residents regarding residency training under current influencing factors, such as a high workload, the new training regulations or expected changes in the hospital landscape and to identify options for optimizing training and working conditions. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn addition to an extensive literature search, this article is based on published opinions and survey results as well as lectures and discussions at congresses held in the past year. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: To ensure a modern high-quality education and to maintain enthusiasm for surgery, the need for adjustments and innovation must be recognized and long-requested modifictions to established structures must be implemented. Flexible working models, the structured and transparent implementation of surgical residency training and modern training units, long-term planning of training curricula and new personnel structures with an expansion of teaching and feedback culture are options for improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37580585What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.