Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580581›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Cost associated with diverting ostomy after rectal cancer surgery: a transnational analysis.

Benjamin P Geisler, Khoa N Cao, Anne M Ryschon, Karim Alavi, Niels Komen, Jan B Pietzsch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions targeting quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer and a fecal ostomy: A systematic review.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Benjamin P GeislerInstitute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Khoa N CaoWing Tech Inc., 101 Jefferson Drive, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Anne M RyschonWing Tech Inc., 101 Jefferson Drive, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Karim AlaviDepartment of Surgery/Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, UMass Memorial Health/UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Niels KomenDepartment Abdominal Surgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen/ReSURG, Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Jan B PietzschWing Tech Inc., 101 Jefferson Drive, Menlo Park, CA, USA. jpietzsch@wing-tech.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5078-1939
Menlo School · USHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEJefferson Community and Technical College · USUMass Memorial Health Care · USUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiverting ileostomy and colostomy after total mesorectal excision reduces the risk of complications related to anastomotic leakages but is associated with a reduction in health-related quality of life and long-term economic consequences that are unknown. Our objective was to estimate the lifetime costs of stoma placement after rectal cancer resection in the U.S., England, and Germany.

methodsInput parameters were derived from quasi-systematic literature searches. Decision-analytic models with survival from colorectal cancer-adjusted life tables and country-specific stoma reversal proportions were created for the three countries to calculate lifetime costs. Main cost items were stoma maintenance costs and reimbursement for reversal procedures. Discounting was applied according to respective national guidelines. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore the impact of parameter uncertainty onto the results.

resultsThe cohort starting ages and median survival were 63 and 11.5 years for the U.S., 69 years and 8.5 years for England, and 71 and 6.5 years for Germany. Lifetime discounted stoma-related costs were $26,311, £9512, and €10,021, respectively. All three models were most sensitive to the proportion of ostomy reversal, age at baseline, and discount rate applied.

conclusionConservative model-based projections suggest that stoma care leads to significant long-term costs. Efforts to reduce the number of patients who need to undergo a diverting ostomy could result in meaningful cost savings.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsSurgical StomasAnastomosis, SurgicalColostomyHumansIleostomyPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRectumRetrospective StudiesColostomyCosts and cost analysisEnglandRectal neoplasmsSurgical stomasUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37580581
OpenAlexW4385802854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.