ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023
Application and evaluation of surgical tool and tool tip recognition based on Convolutional Neural Network in multiple endoscopic surgical scenarios.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Development of an Artificial Intelligence Platform for Surgical Tool Detection and Phase Recognition in Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy.Journal of gastric cancer · 2026Article
- Bibliometric analysis of deep learning for surgical instrument segmentation, detection and tracking in minimally invasive surgery.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Development of an artificial intelligence based virtual tool for measuring distances during image-guided surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- AI and machine learning in paediatric spine deformity surgery.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- Deep learning HRNet FCN for blood vessel identification in laparoscopic pancreatic surgery.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: A Review.Cancer informatics · 2025Review
- LC-YOLOmatch: a novel scene segmentation approach based on YOLO for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, computer-assisted intervention and robot-assisted surgery are receiving increasing attention. The need for real-time identification and tracking of surgical tools and tool tips is constantly demanding. A series of researches focusing on surgical tool tracking and identification have been performed. However, the size of dataset, the sensitivity/precision, and the response time of these studies were limited. In this work, we developed and utilized an automated method based on Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and You Only Look Once (YOLO) v3 algorithm to locate and identify surgical tools and tool tips covering five different surgical scenarios. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn algorithm of object detection was applied to identify and locate the surgical tools and tool tips. DarkNet-19 was used as Backbone Network and YOLOv3 was modified and applied for the detection. We included a series of 181 endoscopy videos covering 5 different surgical scenarios: pancreatic surgery, thyroid surgery, colon surgery, gastric surgery, and external scenes. A total amount of 25,333 images containing 94,463 targets were collected. Training and test sets were divided in a proportion of 2.5:1. The data sets were openly stored at the Kaggle database.
resultsUnder an Intersection over Union threshold of 0.5, the overall sensitivity and precision rate of the model were 93.02% and 89.61% for tool recognition and 87.05% and 83.57% for tool tip recognition, respectively. The model demonstrated the highest tool and tool tip recognition sensitivity and precision rate under external scenes. Among the four different internal surgical scenes, the network had better performances in pancreatic and colon surgeries and poorer performances in gastric and thyroid surgeries.
conclusionWe developed a surgical tool and tool tip recognition model based on CNN and YOLOv3. Validation of our model demonstrated satisfactory precision, accuracy, and robustness across different surgical scenes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37580576What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.