Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580576›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Application and evaluation of surgical tool and tool tip recognition based on Convolutional Neural Network in multiple endoscopic surgical scenarios.

Lu Ping, Zhihong Wang, Jingjing Yao, Junyi Gao, Sen Yang, Jiayi Li, Jile Shi, Wenming Wu, Surong Hua, Huizhen Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lu Ping *8-Year MD Program, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhihong Wang *8-Year MD Program, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jingjing YaoDepartment of Nursing, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Junyi GaoDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Sen YangDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jiayi Li8-Year MD Program, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jile Shi8-Year MD Program, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Wenming WuDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Surong HuaDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. huasurong@tsinghua.org.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-3630-3954
Huizhen WangDepartment of Nursing, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. whzhen72@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, computer-assisted intervention and robot-assisted surgery are receiving increasing attention. The need for real-time identification and tracking of surgical tools and tool tips is constantly demanding. A series of researches focusing on surgical tool tracking and identification have been performed. However, the size of dataset, the sensitivity/precision, and the response time of these studies were limited. In this work, we developed and utilized an automated method based on Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and You Only Look Once (YOLO) v3 algorithm to locate and identify surgical tools and tool tips covering five different surgical scenarios. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn algorithm of object detection was applied to identify and locate the surgical tools and tool tips. DarkNet-19 was used as Backbone Network and YOLOv3 was modified and applied for the detection. We included a series of 181 endoscopy videos covering 5 different surgical scenarios: pancreatic surgery, thyroid surgery, colon surgery, gastric surgery, and external scenes. A total amount of 25,333 images containing 94,463 targets were collected. Training and test sets were divided in a proportion of 2.5:1. The data sets were openly stored at the Kaggle database.

resultsUnder an Intersection over Union threshold of 0.5, the overall sensitivity and precision rate of the model were 93.02% and 89.61% for tool recognition and 87.05% and 83.57% for tool tip recognition, respectively. The model demonstrated the highest tool and tool tip recognition sensitivity and precision rate under external scenes. Among the four different internal surgical scenes, the network had better performances in pancreatic and colon surgeries and poorer performances in gastric and thyroid surgeries.

conclusionWe developed a surgical tool and tool tip recognition model based on CNN and YOLOv3. Validation of our model demonstrated satisfactory precision, accuracy, and robustness across different surgical scenes.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerRobotic Surgical ProceduresAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualEndoscopyHumansComputer-assisted interventionConvolutional Neural NetworkRobot-assisted surgerySurgical tool recognitionYOLO

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.