Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580484›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023

A Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm for Improving Image Quality and Hepatic Lesion Detectability in Abdominal Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Preliminary Results.

Bingqian Chu, Lu Gan, Yi Shen, Jian Song, Ling Liu, Jianying Li, Bin Liu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. State-of-the-Art Deep Learning CT Reconstruction Algorithms in Abdominal Imaging.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bingqian Chu *Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Heifei 230022, People's Republic of China.
Lu Gan *Department of Radiology, Huainan Oriental Guangji Hospital, Huainan 232101, People's Republic of China.
Yi ShenDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Heifei 230022, People's Republic of China.
Jian SongDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Heifei 230022, People's Republic of China.
Ling LiuCT Research Center, GE Healthcare China, Shanghai 210000, People's Republic of China.
Jianying LiCT Research Center, GE Healthcare China, Shanghai 210000, People's Republic of China.
Bin LiuDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Heifei 230022, People's Republic of China. lbhyz32@126.com.
Anhui Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CNUnited Imaging Healthcare (China) · CNHuainan Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the performance of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) in improving image quality and diagnostic performance using virtual monochromatic spectral images in abdominal dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). Sixty-two patients [mean age ± standard deviation (SD): 56 years ± 13; 30 men] who underwent abdominal DECT were prospectively included in this study. The 70-keV DECT images in the portal phase were reconstructed at 5-mm and 1.25-mm slice thicknesses with 40% ASIR-V (ASIR-V40%) and at 1.25-mm slice with deep learning image reconstruction at medium (DLIR-M) and high (DLIR-H) levels and then compared. Computed tomography (CT) attenuation, SD values, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured in the liver, spleen, erector spinae, and intramuscular fat. The lesions in each reconstruction group at 1.25-mm slice thickness were counted. The image quality and diagnostic confidence were subjectively evaluated by two radiologists using a 5-point scale. For the 1.25-mm images, DLIR-M and DLIR-H had lower SD, higher SNR and CNR, and better subjective image quality compared with ASIR-V40%; DLIR-H performed the best (all P values < 0.001). Furthermore, the 1.25-mm DLIR-H images had similar SD, SNR, and CNR values as the 5-mm ASIR-V40% images (all P > 0.05). Three image groups had similar lesion detection rates, but DLIR groups exhibited higher confidence in diagnosing lesions. Compared with ASIR-V40% at 70 keV, 70-keV DECT with DLIR-H further reduced image noise and improved image quality. Additionally, it improved diagnostic confidence while ensuring a consistent lesion detection rate of liver lesions.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAbdomenAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleRadiation DosageRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomographyAdaptive statistical iterative reconstructionComputed tomographyDeep learningDual-energy CTImage reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID37580484
PMCPMC10584787
OpenAlexW4385801412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.