Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580429›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2024

Animal models to study cardiac regeneration.

Michael Weinberger, Paul R Riley

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Signaling pathways regulating cardiac regeneration.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Biologics for cardiovascular diseases: from bench to bedside.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Refining the Guinea Pig (Cavia porcellus) Cryo-Injury Model for Cardiac Regeneration and Functional Characterization.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ex vivo functional whole organ in biomedical research: a review.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael WeinbergerInstitute of Developmental & Regenerative Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8235-6825
Paul R RileyInstitute of Developmental & Regenerative Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. paul.riley@idrm.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9862-7332

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/11/1/28798British Heart Foundation RG/18/5/33532Medical Research Council MR/T017074/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Permanent fibrosis and chronic deterioration of heart function in patients after myocardial infarction present a major health-care burden worldwide. In contrast to the restricted potential for cellular and functional regeneration of the adult mammalian heart, a robust capacity for cardiac regeneration is seen during the neonatal period in mammals as well as in the adults of many fish and amphibian species. However, we lack a complete understanding as to why cardiac regeneration takes place more efficiently in some species than in others. The capacity of the heart to regenerate after injury is controlled by a complex network of cellular and molecular mechanisms that form a regulatory landscape, either permitting or restricting regeneration. In this Review, we provide an overview of the diverse array of vertebrates that have been studied for their cardiac regenerative potential and discuss differential heart regeneration outcomes in closely related species. Additionally, we summarize current knowledge about the core mechanisms that regulate cardiac regeneration across vertebrate species.

Indexed as

HeartMyocardial InfarctionAnimalsCardiovascular Physiological PhenomenaCell ProliferationHumansInfant, NewbornMammalsModels, AnimalMyocytes, CardiacRegeneration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.