Trial reportEye (London, England)2024
African American patient-provider communication about glaucoma vision quality-of-life.
Trial report in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Scoping Review of Health Literacy Measurement in U.S. Interventions: Trends, Tools, and Gaps.Health literacy research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesLittle is known about African American patient-provider communication about glaucoma-related quality-of-life. The objectives of this study were to: (a) examine associations between patient socio-demographics and vision quality-of-life, (b) describe the extent to which eye care providers and patients discuss glaucoma-related quality-of-life, and (c) examine associations between patient and provider characteristics, whether the patient was in the intervention or usual care group, and whether the patient and provider discuss one or more glaucoma-related quality-of-life domains.
methodsAdult African American patients with glaucoma who reported non-adherence to glaucoma medications were enrolled from three sites. Patients completed a vision quality-of-life VFQ-25 assessment. Patients were randomized into intervention and control groups with intervention group members receiving a glaucoma question prompt list and watching a video before a provider visit. Audio recordings from these visits were transcribed and assessed for glaucoma-related quality-of-life discussions.
resultsOne hundred and eighty-nine patients were enrolled. Glaucoma-related quality-of-life was discussed during 12.3% of visits (N = 23). Patients initiated discussion 56.5% (N = 13) of the time and providers 43.5% (N = 10) of the time. Patients with worse health literacy (p < 0.001), more depressive symptoms (p < 0.05), and more severe glaucoma (p < 0.001) were significantly more likely to have worse vision-related quality-of-life. Glaucoma-related quality-of-life was significantly more likely to be discussed when African American patients saw African American providers (p < 0.05).
conclusionPatients and providers rarely discussed the patient's glaucoma-related quality-of-life. The intervention did not significantly increase communication about glaucoma-related quality-of-life. Residency programs should consider enhancing training regarding discussing patients' quality-of-life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.