Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580410›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2023

Development and validation of a reinforcement learning model for ventilation control during emergence from general anesthesia.

Hyeonhoon Lee, Hyun-Kyu Yoon, Jaewon Kim, Ji Soo Park, Chang-Hoon Koo, Dongwook Won, Hyung-Chul Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hyeonhoon Lee *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9426-823X
Hyun-Kyu Yoon *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jaewon KimCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Soo ParkDepartment of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chang-Hoon KooDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Dongwook WonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyung-Chul LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. vital@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0048-7958

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) HI20C1220Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) HI21C1074National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2020R1C1C1014905National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2022R1C1C1012753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ventilation should be assisted without asynchrony or cardiorespiratory instability during anesthesia emergence until sufficient spontaneous ventilation is recovered. In this multicenter cohort study, we develop and validate a reinforcement learning-based Artificial Intelligence model for Ventilation control during Emergence (AIVE) from general anesthesia. Ventilatory and hemodynamic parameters from 14,306 surgical cases at an academic hospital between 2016 and 2019 are used for training and internal testing of the model. The model's performance is also evaluated on the external validation cohort, which includes 406 cases from another academic hospital in 2022. The estimated reward of the model's policy is higher than that of the clinicians' policy in the internal (0.185, the 95% lower bound for best AIVE policy vs. -0.406, the 95% upper bound for clinicians' policy) and external validation (0.506, the 95% lower bound for best AIVE policy vs. 0.154, the 95% upper bound for clinicians' policy). Cardiorespiratory instability is minimized as the clinicians' ventilation matches the model's ventilation. Regarding feature importance, airway pressure is the most critical factor for ventilation control. In conclusion, the AIVE model achieves higher estimated rewards with fewer complications than clinicians' ventilation control policy during anesthesia emergence.

Identifiers

PMID37580410
PMCPMC10425339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.