Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580348›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Effects of nature on restorative and cognitive benefits in indoor environment.

Jee Heon Rhee, Brian Schermer, Gisung Han, So Yeon Park, Kyung Hoon Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Forest Bathing (Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nonlinear Associations of Accelerometer-Based Sedentary Time With Cognitive Functions in the UK Biobank.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jee Heon RheeSchool of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Brian SchermerSchool of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Gisung HanInstitute of Engineering Research, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
So Yeon ParkDepartment of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Delft, The Netherlands.
Kyung Hoon LeeDepartment of Architecture, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. kh92lee@korea.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of natural exposure in an indoor environment on restorative quality and cognitive ability. Thirty participants were shown nature at three different indoor sites: baseline, indoor (some vegetation), and semi-indoor (a large amount of vegetation and view to sky) for five minutes. After viewing, they completed an assessment of restoration and a cognitive task, and their electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. Compared to the baseline, the sites with nature resulted in restorative (higher perceived restoration scores) and cognitive (higher working memory performance and lower delta-to-theta ratio (DTR), delta-to-alpha ratio (DAR), theta-to-beta ratio (TBR), and alpha-to-beta ratio (ABR) responses) benefits. These findings further our understanding of the effects of exposure to nature on restorative and cognitive benefits in an indoor environment, and help to build guidance for future research on the effects of nature indoors and designing restorative- and cognitive-enhancing indoor spaces.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyMemory, Short-TermCognitionForecastingHumans

Identifiers

PMID37580348
PMCPMC10425438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.