Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580124›Full record

ArticleRespiratory care2023

A Comparison of Proximal and Tracheal Airway Pressures During Pressure Controlled Ventilation.

Mark O Zander, Nikola Stankovic, Mirko Meboldt, Thomas O Erb, Jürg Hammer, Marianne Schmid Daners

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark O ZanderProduct Development Group Zurich, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nikola StankovicDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Children's Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Mirko MeboldtProduct Development Group Zurich, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Thomas O ErbDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Children's Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jürg HammerDivision of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, University Children's Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Marianne Schmid DanersInstitute for Dynamic Systems and Control, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. marischm@ethz.ch.
ETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAirway pressure is usually measured by sensors placed in the ventilator or on the ventilator side of the endotracheal tube (ETT), at the Y-piece. These remote measurements serve as a surrogate for the tracheal or alveolar pressure. Tracheal pressure can only be predicted correctly by using a model that incorporates the pressure at the remote location, the flow through the ETT, and the resistance of the ETT if the latter is a predictable function of Y-piece flow. However, this is not consistently appropriate, and accuracy of prediction is hampered.

methodsThis in vitro study systematically examined the ventilator pressure in dependence of compliance of the respiratory system (C

resultsTracheal pressures were always lower (maximum 8 cm H

conclusionsDependent on C

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationTracheaHumansIntubation, IntratrachealRespirationRespiration, ArtificialVentilators, Mechanicalintratracheal pressureintratracheal pressure sensorinvasive ventilationmechanical lung simulatorpressure-controlled ventilationrespiratory system compliance

Identifiers

PMID37580124
PMCPMC10676261
OpenAlexW4385801835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.