Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580109›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2023

Single-cell analysis reveals key differences between early-stage and late-stage systemic sclerosis skin across autoantibody subgroups.

Kristina Elizabeth Neergaard Clark, Shiwen Xu, Moustafa Attah, Voon H Ong, Christopher Dominic Buckley, Christopher P Denton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Kristina Elizabeth Neergaard ClarkCentre for Rheumatology, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5926-3900
Shiwen XuCentre for Rheumatology, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK.
Moustafa AttahKennedy Institute of Rheumatology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Voon H OngCentre for Rheumatology, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK.
Christopher Dominic BuckleyKennedy Institute of Rheumatology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Christopher P DentonCentre for Rheumatology, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK c.denton@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3975-8938
The Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T001631/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe severity of skin involvement in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) depends on stage of disease and differs between anti-RNA-polymerase III (ARA) and anti-topoisomerase antibody (ATA) subsets. We have investigated cellular differences in well-characterised dcSSc patients compared with healthy controls (HCs).

methodsWe performed single-cell RNA sequencing on 4 mm skin biopsy samples from 12 patients with dcSSc and HCs (n=3) using droplet-based sequencing (10× genomics). Patients were well characterised by stage (>5 or <5 years disease duration) and autoantibody (ATA+ or ARA+). Analysis of whole skin cell subsets and fibroblast subpopulations across stage and ANA subgroup were used to interpret potential cellular differences anchored by these subgroups.

resultsFifteen forearm skin biopsies were analysed. There was a clear separation of SSc samples, by disease, stage and antibody, for all cells and fibroblast subclusters. Further analysis revealed differing cell cluster gene expression profiles between ATA+ and ARA+ patients. Cell-to-cell interaction suggest differing interactions between early and late stages of disease and autoantibody. TGFβ response was mainly seen in fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells in early ATA+dcSSc skin samples, whereas in early ARA+dcSSc patient skin samples, the responding cells were endothelial, reflect broader differences between clinical phenotypes and distinct skin score trajectories across autoantibody subgroups of dcSSc.

conclusionsWe have identified cellular differences between the two main autoantibody subsets in dcSSc (ARA+ and ATA+). These differences reinforce the importance of considering autoantibody and stage of disease in management and trial design in SSc.

Indexed as

Scleroderma, DiffuseScleroderma, SystemicAutoantibodiesHumansSingle-Cell AnalysisSkinAutoantibodiesAutoantibodiesFibroblastsScleroderma, Systemic

Identifiers

PMID37580109
PMCPMC10646865
OpenAlexW4385802294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.