ArticleAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2023
Single-cell analysis reveals key differences between early-stage and late-stage systemic sclerosis skin across autoantibody subgroups.
Article in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Causal Relationships Between Oral Microbiota and Inflammatory Skin Diseases.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Multimodal analyses of early, untreated systemic sclerosis skin identify a proinflammatory vascular niche of macrophage-fibroblast signaling.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Genetic and Genomic Analysis of Systemic Sclerosis: A Narrative Review of the Recent Advancement.JMA journal · 2026Review
- The immune landscape of systemic sclerosis: from pathogenic mechanisms to precision therapeutic breakthroughs.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Systemic sclerosis: bridging clinical and molecular insights: results from the PRECISESADS study.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- [Pharmacological inhibition of fibrosis exemplified by systemic sclerosis : Possibilities and limits].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis: From disease bystanders to pathogenic players.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2025Review
- Characterization of a pathogenic nonmigratory fibroblast population in systemic sclerosis skin.JCI insight · 2025Article
- Unique and shared transcriptomic signatures underlying localized scleroderma pathogenesis identified using interpretable machine learning.JCI insight · 2025Article
- Immunoglobulins G from Patients with Systemic Sclerosis Modify the Molecular Signatures of Endothelial Cells.RMD open · 2025Article
- An international perspective on the future of systemic sclerosis research.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2025Review
- Identification and validation of anti-protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) antibody as a novel biomarker for systemic sclerosis (SSc).Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2024Article
- [Skin fibrosis : Novel insights in pathophysiology and treatment].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- The role of dermal fibroblasts in autoimmune skin diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Analyses Identify APLNR, INS-IGF2, RGCC Genes May Be Involved in the Pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis Skin.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe severity of skin involvement in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) depends on stage of disease and differs between anti-RNA-polymerase III (ARA) and anti-topoisomerase antibody (ATA) subsets. We have investigated cellular differences in well-characterised dcSSc patients compared with healthy controls (HCs).
methodsWe performed single-cell RNA sequencing on 4 mm skin biopsy samples from 12 patients with dcSSc and HCs (n=3) using droplet-based sequencing (10× genomics). Patients were well characterised by stage (>5 or <5 years disease duration) and autoantibody (ATA+ or ARA+). Analysis of whole skin cell subsets and fibroblast subpopulations across stage and ANA subgroup were used to interpret potential cellular differences anchored by these subgroups.
resultsFifteen forearm skin biopsies were analysed. There was a clear separation of SSc samples, by disease, stage and antibody, for all cells and fibroblast subclusters. Further analysis revealed differing cell cluster gene expression profiles between ATA+ and ARA+ patients. Cell-to-cell interaction suggest differing interactions between early and late stages of disease and autoantibody. TGFβ response was mainly seen in fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells in early ATA+dcSSc skin samples, whereas in early ARA+dcSSc patient skin samples, the responding cells were endothelial, reflect broader differences between clinical phenotypes and distinct skin score trajectories across autoantibody subgroups of dcSSc.
conclusionsWe have identified cellular differences between the two main autoantibody subsets in dcSSc (ARA+ and ATA+). These differences reinforce the importance of considering autoantibody and stage of disease in management and trial design in SSc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.