Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580104›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open ophthalmology2023

Multivariate analysis of refractive state in eyes with keratoconus.

Elizabeth Chetty

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elizabeth ChettyDepartment of Optometry, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, South Africa echetty@uj.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0002-5136-2787

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo demonstrate a multivariate method of analysis of the short-term variation of refractive state in keratoconus (KC) patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this observational study, 19 eyes with KC and 19 healthy control eyes were measured. The study included both male and female participants and the mean age was 23.6 years (range 18-34 years) and 23.2 years (range 22-26 years) for KC and control participants, respectively. Forty consecutive autorefractor measurements were taken for each participant and the short-term variation thereof was analysed using multivariate methods of analysis. RESULTS AND

conclusionShort-term variation of refractive state is greater in eyes with KC than in healthy control eyes and variation increases with severity of disease. A novel finding was that there was much more ortho-astigmatic and oblique-astigmatic variation seen in KC eyes than in control eyes which had predominately stigmatic variation. Refractive state is described by three components, namely, sphere, cylinder and axis. Although it is multivariate in nature, it is often analysed using univariate statistical methods. In diseases such as KC, where early diagnosis is crucial for a good prognosis, it is necessary that researchers endeavour to investigate the disease from different perspectives to fully understand the nature of the disease. This paper comprehensively demonstrates the multivariate statistical methods of analysis of refractive data. The implementation of this analysis provides insight into the short-term variation of refractive data in healthy and keratoconic eyes, and these findings have not been demonstrated before using univariate statistics.

Indexed as

KeratoconusAdolescentAdultCorneaCorneal TopographyFemaleHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisRefraction, OcularYoung Adultcorneaoptics and refraction

Identifiers

PMID37580104
PMCPMC10432643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.