Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580093›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Which programmes and policies across health and community settings will generate the most significant impacts for youth suicide prevention in Australia and the UK? Protocol for a systems modelling and simulation study.

Maria Michail, Jo Robinson, Katrina Witt, Jo-An Occhipinti, Adam Skinner, Michelle Lamblin, Maria Veresova, Dzenana Kartal, Justin Waring

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Lived Experience Participation in Suicide Prevention Activities in Australia, a Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria MichailSchool of Psychology, Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK M.Michail@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7380-3494
Jo RobinsonOrygen The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Katrina WittOrygen The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Jo-An OcchipintiBrain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Adam SkinnerBrain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Michelle LamblinOrygen The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Maria VeresovaOrygen The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Dzenana KartalOrygen The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Justin WaringSchool of Social Policy, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
The University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSuicide is a leading cause of mortality among young people aged 15-24 globally. Despite the deployment of comprehensive suicide prevention strategies, we still do not know which interventions, for which groups of young people, for how long and with what intensity could generate the most significant reductions in suicide rates. System dynamics modelling has the potential to address these gaps. SEYMOUR (System Dynamics Modelling for Suicide Prevention) will develop and evaluate a system dynamics model that will indicate which suicide prevention interventions could generate the most significant reductions in rates of suicide and attempted suicide among young people aged 12-25 in Australia and the UK. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A comparative case study design, applying participatory system dynamics modelling in North-West Melbourne (Australia) and Birmingham (UK). A computer simulation model of mental health service pathways and suicidal behaviour among young people in North-West Melbourne will be developed through three workshops with expert stakeholder groups (young people with lived experience, carers, clinicians, policy makers, commissioners). The model will be calibrated and validated using national, state and local datasets (inputs). The simulation model will test a series of interventions identified in the workshops for inclusion. Primary model outputs include suicide deaths, self-harm hospitalisations and self-harm presentations to emergency departments. An implementation strategy for the sustainable embedding of promising suicide prevention interventions will be developed. This will be followed by model customisation, re-parameterisation, and validation in Birmingham and adaptation of the implementation strategy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project has received approval from the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (2022-22885-25971-4), the University of Birmingham Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Ethics Review Committee (ERN_21-02385) and the UK HRA (22/HRA/3826). SEYMOUR's dissemination strategy includes open-access academic publications, conference presentations, accessible findings coproduced with young people, e-briefs to policy makers, webinars for service providers and commissioners.

Indexed as

PolicySuicide PreventionAdolescentAustraliaComputer SimulationHumansUnited KingdomDecision MakingHealth policyMENTAL HEALTHSuicide & self-harm

Identifiers

PMID37580093
PMCPMC10432673
OpenAlexW4385814152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.