Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37579998›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2023

Cross-attractor modeling of resting-state functional connectivity in psychiatric disorders.

Yinming Sun, Mengsen Zhang, Manish Saggar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yinming SunDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
Mengsen ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
Manish SaggarDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304, USA. Electronic address: saggar@stanford.edu.

Funding

Examining the hierarchical structure of the RDoC framework using large-scale data-driven computational approachesR01MH127608 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SAGGAR, MANISH · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Only time will tell: a computational psychiatry approach to model temporal transitions in brain activity as a lens towards developing better diagnostic nosology for psychiatric illnessDP2MH119735 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SAGGAR, MANISH · 2018 to 2018
$2.4M
NIMH NIH HHS DP2 MH119735NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH127608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) is altered across various psychiatric disorders. Brain network modeling (BNM) has the potential to reveal the neurobiological underpinnings of such abnormalities by dynamically modeling the structure-function relationship and examining biologically relevant parameters after fitting the models with real data. Although innovative BNM approaches have been developed, two main issues need to be further addressed. First, previous BNM approaches are primarily limited to simulating noise-driven dynamics near a chosen attractor (or a stable brain state). An alternative approach is to examine multi(or cross)-attractor dynamics, which can be used to better capture non-stationarity and switching between states in the resting brain. Second, previous BNM work is limited to characterizing one disorder at a time. Given the large degree of co-morbidity across psychiatric disorders, comparing BNMs across disorders might provide a novel avenue to generate insights regarding the dynamical features that are common across (vs. specific to) disorders. Here, we address these issues by (1) examining the layout of the attractor repertoire over the entire multi-attractor landscape using a recently developed cross-attractor BNM approach; and (2) characterizing and comparing multiple disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar, and ADHD) with healthy controls using an openly available and moderately large multimodal dataset from the UCLA Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics. Both global and local differences were observed across disorders. Specifically, the global coupling between regions was significantly decreased in schizophrenia patients relative to healthy controls. At the same time, the ratio between local excitation and inhibition was significantly higher in the schizophrenia group than the ADHD group. In line with these results, the schizophrenia group had the lowest switching costs (energy gaps) across groups for several networks including the default mode network. Paired comparison also showed that schizophrenia patients had significantly lower energy gaps than healthy controls for the somatomotor and visual networks. Overall, this study provides preliminary evidence supporting transdiagnostic multi-attractor BNM approaches to better understand psychiatric disorders' pathophysiology.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersSchizophreniaBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingAttractor landscapeBrain network modeling (BNM)Cross-attractor coordinationPsychiatric disordersRSFC

Identifiers

PMID37579998
PMCPMC10515743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.