Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37579450›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2023

Austerity by Design Comment on "Ensuring Global Health Equity in a Post-pandemic Economy".

Indra de Soysa

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Transforming Capitalism, From Top Down to Bottom Up; A Response to the Recent Commentaries.International journal of health policy and management · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Indra de SoysaDepartment of Sociology & Political Science (ISS), Norwegian University of Science & Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2751-4223

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several scholars across many disciplines argue that neoliberal, free-market economic conditions drive inequalities, generating poverty and misery due to unfair austerity, ultimately affecting human health. Professor Labonté's prescription is that we jettison these policies targeting economic growth and development for generating greater fairness for the world's poor. This rejoinder argues contrarily that the criticism of neoliberal policies are misplaced, and that degrowth is really "self-imposed austerity," which will not benefit the poor. This rejoinder scrutinizes some simple stylized fact and assesses the soundness of the broader arguments. The evidence suggests clearly that becoming wealthy and following prudent economic policies is the best path to improving population health, equity, and other progressive outcomes. Badly required growth for the poor comes from free markets and good governance, and equity for the sake of fairness neither results in better health outcomes, nor an improved environment.

Indexed as

Global HealthHealth EquityHumansPandemicsClimate ChangeDegrowthEconomic DevelopmentInequalityPopulation Health

Identifiers

PMID37579450
PMCPMC10125060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.