Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37579437›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2023

Systems Thinking and Complexity Science Methods and the Policy Process in Non-communicable Disease Prevention: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Chloe Clifford Astbury, Kirsten M Lee, Elizabeth McGill, Janielle Clarke, Matt Egan, Afton Halloran, Regina Malykh, Holly Rippin, Kremlin Wickramasinghe, Tarra L Penney

Open access · diamondAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Chloe Clifford AstburyGlobal Food System & Policy Research, School of Global Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2955-7833
Kirsten M LeeGlobal Food System & Policy Research, School of Global Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9166-5547
Elizabeth McGillDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3841-8467
Janielle ClarkeGlobal Food System & Policy Research, School of Global Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Matt EganDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4040-200X
Afton HalloranWorld Health Organization European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-8760-4645
Regina MalykhWorld Health Organization European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0001-8037-1239
Holly RippinWorld Health Organization European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-8879-3978
Kremlin WickramasingheWorld Health Organization European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0001-9497-7901
Tarra L PenneyGlobal Food System & Policy Research, School of Global Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4889-9102
York University · CAWHO European Office for the Prevention and Control of NCD · RULondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the complex determinants of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), and the dynamic policy landscape, researchers and policymakers are exploring the use of systems thinking and complexity science (STCS) in developing effective policies. The aim of this review is to systematically identify and analyse existing applications of STCS-informed methods in NCD prevention policy.

methodsSystematic scoping review: We searched academic databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE) for all publications indexed by 13 October 2020, screening titles, abstracts and full texts and extracting data according to published guidelines. We summarised key data from each study, mapping applications of methods informed by STCS to policy process domains. We conducted a thematic analysis to identify advantages, limitations, barriers and facilitators to using STCS.

results4681 papers were screened and 112 papers were included in this review. The most common policy areas were tobacco control, obesity prevention and physical activity promotion. Methods applied included system dynamics modelling, agent-based modelling and concept mapping. Advantages included supporting evidence-informed decision-making; modelling complex systems and addressing multi-sectoral problems. Limitations included the abstraction of reality by STCS methods, despite aims of encompassing greater complexity. Challenges included resource-intensiveness; lack of stakeholder trust in models; and results that were too complex to be comprehensible to stakeholders. Ensuring stakeholder ownership and presenting findings in a user-friendly way facilitated STCS use.

conclusionThis review maps the proliferating applications of STCS methods in NCD prevention policy. STCS methods have the potential to generate tailored and dynamic evidence, adding robustness to evidence-informed policymaking, but must be accessible to policy stakeholders and have strong stakeholder ownership to build consensus and change stakeholder perspectives. Evaluations of whether, and under what circumstances, STCS methods lead to more effective policies compared to conventional methods are lacking, and would enable more targeted and constructive use of these methods.

Indexed as

Health PolicyNoncommunicable DiseasesHumansObesityPolicy MakingSystems AnalysisComplexity ScienceNon-Communicable DiseasePolicyPopulation-Level PreventionSystems Thinking

Identifiers

PMID37579437
PMCPMC10125079
OpenAlexW4321349588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.