Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37579426›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2023

Towards A Framework for Implementing Remote Patient Monitoring From an Integrated Care Perspective: A Scoping Review.

Rafael Miranda, Mónica Duarte Oliveira, Paulo Nicola, Filipa Matos Baptista, Isabel Albuquerque

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Implementation of Remote Patient Monitoring for Hypertension Management.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rafael MirandaCentro de Estudos de Gestão do Instituto Superior Técnico (CEG-IST), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0677-1642
Mónica Duarte OliveiraCentro de Estudos de Gestão do Instituto Superior Técnico (CEG-IST), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4053-9214
Paulo NicolaInstituto de Medicina Preventiva e Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portuga.ORCID 0000-0003-0175-8457
Filipa Matos BaptistaEnterprise Services, Siemens Healthineers Portugal, Lisboa, Portuga.ORCID 0000-0002-4754-430X
Isabel AlbuquerqueComprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6258-0317

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote patient monitoring (RPM) has been increasingly adopted over the last decade, with the COVID-19 pandemic fostering its rapid development. As RPM implementation is recognised as complex and highly demanding in terms of resources and processes, there are multiple challenges in providing RPM in an integrated logic.

methodsTo examine the structural elements that are relevant for implementing RPM integrated care, a scoping review was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, leveraging a search strategy that combines terms relative to (1) conceptual models and reallife initiatives; (2) RPM; and (3) care integration.

results28 articles were included, covering nine conceptual models and 19 real-life initiatives. Eighteen structural elements of RPM integrated care implementation were identified among conceptual models, defining a structure for assessing real-life initiatives. 78.9% of those initiatives referred to at least ten structural elements, with

conclusionRPM goes far beyond technology, with underlying processes and involved actors playing a central role in care provision. The structural elements identified can guide RPM implementation and promote maturity in adoption. Future research may focus on assessing design completeness, evaluating impacts, and analysing related financial arrangements.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedCommunicationHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicPandemicsHealthcare OrganizationIntegrated CareRemote Patient MonitoringScoping ReviewTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID37579426
PMCPMC10461888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.