Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37579391›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2023

Employee-Driven Innovation in Health Organizations: Insights From a Scoping Review.

Stephanie B M Cadeddu, Labante Outcha Dare, Jean-Louis Denis

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. From clinical challenges to innovation: an idea finding approach for advancing healthcare.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Involving Service Users in Care Regulation: A Scoping Review of Empirical Literature.International journal of health policy and management · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie B M CadedduHealth Hub: Politics, Organizations, and Law (H-POD), University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5203-6465
Labante Outcha DareSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jean-Louis DenisHealth Hub: Politics, Organizations, and Law (H-POD), University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1295-332X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmployee-driven innovation (EDI) occurs when frontline actors in health organizations use their firsthand experience to spur new ideas to transform care. Despite its increasing prevalence in health organizations, the organizational conditions under which EDI is operationalized have received little scholarly attention.

methodsThis scoping review identifies gaps and assembles existing knowledge on four questions: What is EDI in health organizations and which frontline actors are involved? What are the characteristics of the EDI process? What contextual factors enable or impede EDI? And what benefits does EDI bring to health organizations? We searched seven databases with keywords related to EDI in health organizations. After screening 1580 studies by title and abstract, we undertook full-text review of 453 articles, retaining 60 for analysis. We performed a descriptive and an inductive thematic analysis guided by the four questions.

resultsFindings reveal an heterogeneous literature. Most articles are descriptive (n = 41). Few studies are conceptual and empirical (n = 15) and four are conference papers. EDI was often described as a participatory, learning innovation process involving frontline clinical and non-clinical staff and managers. Majority EDI were top-down, often driven by the organization's focus on participatory improvement and innovation and research-based initiatives. Five categories of methods is used in top-down EDI, two thirds of which includes a learning, a team and/or a digital component. Hybrid EDI often involves a team-based component. Bottom-up EDI emerged spontaneously from the work of frontline actors. Enablers, barriers, and benefits of EDI are seen at macro, organizational, team and individual levels; some benefits spread to other health organizations and health systems.

conclusionThis scoping review provides a comprehensive understanding of the organizational conditions under which EDI is operationalized. It offers insights for researchers, health organizations, and policy-makers about how and why frontline actors' involvement is crucial for the transformation of care.

Indexed as

OrganizationsAdministrative PersonnelGovernment ProgramsHumansLearningBottom-Up InnovationFrontline EmployeesHealth SystemInnovative OrganizationsScoping Study

Identifiers

PMID37579391
PMCPMC10425658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.