ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2023
Employee-Driven Innovation in Health Organizations: Insights From a Scoping Review.
Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Formative evaluation of an employee-driven approach to improve care in the dying phase in hospitals.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Trial
- From clinical challenges to innovation: an idea finding approach for advancing healthcare.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Enhancing the accuracy of a multivariable prediction model to identify medical patients suitable for same day emergency care services.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- Clinician Participation in Innovation Labs at University Hospitals: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- How Formal and Informal Nurse Leaders Enact Shared Implementation Leadership in a Hospital Setting.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Exploring Perspectives of Health Care Professionals on AI in Palliative Care: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Involving Service Users in Care Regulation: A Scoping Review of Empirical Literature.International journal of health policy and management · 2025Article
- Review
- Standing together at the helm - how employees experience employee-driven innovation in primary care.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Organizational Culture Relation With Innovation Comment on "Employee-Driven Innovation in Health Organizations: Insights From a Scoping Review".International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Activating Mechanisms Through Employee-Driven Innovation Comment on "Employee-Driven Innovation in Health Organizations: Insights From a Scoping Review".International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Required Capabilities for Employee-Driven Innovation to Emerge in Healthcare Organizations Comment on "Employee-Driven Innovation in Health Organizations: Insights from a Scoping Review".International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- All Hands on Deck. Transforming the Health System Requires Innovation, Through Individual- and Diffusion Efforts Comment on "Employee-Driven Innovation in Health Organizations: Insights From a Scoping Review".International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmployee-driven innovation (EDI) occurs when frontline actors in health organizations use their firsthand experience to spur new ideas to transform care. Despite its increasing prevalence in health organizations, the organizational conditions under which EDI is operationalized have received little scholarly attention.
methodsThis scoping review identifies gaps and assembles existing knowledge on four questions: What is EDI in health organizations and which frontline actors are involved? What are the characteristics of the EDI process? What contextual factors enable or impede EDI? And what benefits does EDI bring to health organizations? We searched seven databases with keywords related to EDI in health organizations. After screening 1580 studies by title and abstract, we undertook full-text review of 453 articles, retaining 60 for analysis. We performed a descriptive and an inductive thematic analysis guided by the four questions.
resultsFindings reveal an heterogeneous literature. Most articles are descriptive (n = 41). Few studies are conceptual and empirical (n = 15) and four are conference papers. EDI was often described as a participatory, learning innovation process involving frontline clinical and non-clinical staff and managers. Majority EDI were top-down, often driven by the organization's focus on participatory improvement and innovation and research-based initiatives. Five categories of methods is used in top-down EDI, two thirds of which includes a learning, a team and/or a digital component. Hybrid EDI often involves a team-based component. Bottom-up EDI emerged spontaneously from the work of frontline actors. Enablers, barriers, and benefits of EDI are seen at macro, organizational, team and individual levels; some benefits spread to other health organizations and health systems.
conclusionThis scoping review provides a comprehensive understanding of the organizational conditions under which EDI is operationalized. It offers insights for researchers, health organizations, and policy-makers about how and why frontline actors' involvement is crucial for the transformation of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.