Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37579223›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of public health2023

The Every Mind Matters campaign: changes in mental health literacy and its associations with campaign awareness.

Jane S Hahn, Kia-Chong Chua, Rebecca Jones, Claire Henderson

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jane S HahnDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London UK.
Kia-Chong ChuaHealth Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, London, UK.
Rebecca JonesDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London UK.
Claire HendersonHealth Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health and Social CareNational Institute for Health ResearchPolicy Research Unit in Mental HealthPublic Health England's Social Marketing
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to investigate the effects on population level mental health literacy (MHL) of Every Mind Matters over 30 months following campaign launch.

methodsTo observe changes in MHL over time, we conducted regression analyses on a nationally representative, repeated cross-sectional dataset of nine survey waves from September 2019 to March 2022 and an individual participant data meta-analysis with data from October 2019 to March 2021 to examine the association between campaign awareness and the outcomes.

resultsThere were small improvements in knowledge of management of stress, depression and anxiety, mental health vigilance, sleep literacy and psychological wellbeing self-efficacy from September 2019 to March 2020 and a deterioration in most MHL outcomes from March 2020 compared with September 2019. Campaign awareness was positively associated with symptom management of depression and anxiety, help seeking self-efficacy, stigma related to mental disorders and mental health vigilance.

conclusionsThere is little evidence that the campaign improved MHL in the general population beyond March 2020. Those who were aware of the campaign may have benefitted from its resources.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyMental DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMental HealthSocial Stigma

Identifiers

PMID37579223
PMCPMC10710357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.