Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37579178›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Exposure to automation explains religious declines.

Joshua Conrad Jackson, Kai Chi Yam, Pok Man Tang, Chris G Sibley, Adam Waytz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Worldwide divergence of values.Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  4. Exposure to automation explains religious declines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua Conrad JacksonBehavioral Science Department, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60640.ORCID 0000-0002-2947-9815
Kai Chi YamManagement & Organizations Department, National University of Singapore Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117561, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7381-8039
Pok Man TangDepartment of Management, Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
Chris G SibleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, NZ 1142.ORCID 0000-0002-4064-8800
Adam WaytzDepartment of Management and Organizations, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global decline of religiosity represents one of the most significant societal shifts in recent history. After millennia of near-universal religious identification, the world is experiencing a regionally uneven trend toward secularization. We propose an explanation of this decline, which claims that automation-the development of robots and artificial intelligence (AI)-can partly explain modern religious declines. We build four unique datasets composed of more than 3 million individuals which show that robotics and AI exposure is linked to 21st-century religious declines across nations, metropolitan regions, and individual people. Key results hold controlling for other technological developments (e.g., electricity grid access and telecommunications development), socioeconomic indicators (e.g., wealth, residential mobility, and demographics), and factors implicated in previous theories of religious decline (e.g., individual choice norms). An experiment also supports our hypotheses. Our findings partly explain contemporary trends in religious decline and foreshadow where religiosity may wane in the future.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceReligionAutomationHumansSocioeconomic Factorsartificial intelligenceautomationcultural evolutionreligion

Identifiers

PMID37579178
PMCPMC10450436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.