Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37579151›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Evolutionary predictors of the specific colors of birds.

Kaspar Delhey, Mihai Valcu, Christina Muck, James Dale, Bart Kempenaers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
35.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Shifting drivers and predictable corridors of an illegal wildlife trade network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bird Community Colours Across Different Types of Habitat.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A complete and dynamic tree of birds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kaspar DelheyDepartment of Ornithology, Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany.
Mihai ValcuDepartment of Ornithology, Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6907-7802
Christina MuckDepartment of Ornithology, Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany.
James DaleSchool of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5950-5829
Bart KempenaersDepartment of Ornithology, Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7505-5458
Max Planck Institute for Ornithology · DEMassey University · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal coloration is one of the most conspicuous aspects of human-perceived organismal diversity, yet also one of the least understood. In particular, explaining why species have specific colors (e.g., blue vs. red) has proven elusive. Here, we quantify for nearly all bird species, the proportion of the body covered by each of 12 human-visible color categories, and test whether existing theory can predict the direction of color evolution. The most common colors are black, white, gray and brown, while the rarest are green, blue, purple, and red. Males have more blue, purple, red, or black, whereas females have more yellow, brown, or gray. Sexual dichromatism is partly due to sexual selection favoring ornamental colors in males but not in females. However, sexual selection also correlated positively with brown in both sexes. Strong social selection favors red and black, colors used in agonistic signaling, with the strongest effects in females. Reduced predation risk selects against cryptic colors (e.g., brown) and favors specific ornamental colors (e.g., black). Nocturnality is mainly associated with brown. The effects of habitat use support the sensory drive theory for camouflage and signaling. Darker colors are more common in species living in wet and cold climates, matching ecogeographical rules. Our study unambiguously supports existing theories of color evolution across an entire class of vertebrates, but much variation remains unexplained.

Indexed as

BirdsSex CharacteristicsAnimalsColorFemaleHumansMalePigmentationcamouflageclimatesensory drivesexual selectionsocial selection

Identifiers

PMID37579151
PMCPMC10450850
OpenAlexW4385800368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.