ArticleAnalytical chemistry2023
Aggregated Molecular Phenotype Scores: Enhancing Assessment and Visualization of Mass Spectrometry Imaging Data for Tissue-Based Diagnostics.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards spatial lipid profiling by using mass spectrometry: analytical challenges and applications.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Streamlining Phenotype Classification and Highlighting Feature Candidates: A Screening Method for Non-Targeted Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry (IMS-MS) Data.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Article
- Mass spectrometry imaging methods for visualizing tumor heterogeneity.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) has gained increasing popularity for tissue-based diagnostics due to its ability to identify and visualize molecular characteristics unique to different phenotypes within heterogeneous samples. Data from MSI experiments are often assessed and visualized using various supervised and unsupervised statistical approaches. However, these approaches tend to fall short in identifying and concisely visualizing subtle, phenotype-relevant molecular changes. To address these shortcomings, we developed aggregated molecular phenotype (AMP) scores. AMP scores are generated using an ensemble machine learning approach to first select features differentiating phenotypes, weight the features using logistic regression, and combine the weights and feature abundances. AMP scores are then scaled between 0 and 1, with lower values generally corresponding to class 1 phenotypes (typically control) and higher scores relating to class 2 phenotypes. AMP scores, therefore, allow the evaluation of multiple features simultaneously and showcase the degree to which these features correlate with various phenotypes. Due to the ensembled approach, AMP scores are able to overcome limitations associated with individual models, leading to high diagnostic accuracy and interpretability. Here, AMP score performance was evaluated using metabolomic data collected from desorption electrospray ionization MSI. Initial comparisons of cancerous human tissues to their normal or benign counterparts illustrated that AMP scores distinguished phenotypes with high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Furthermore, when combined with spatial coordinates, AMP scores allow visualization of tissue sections in one map with distinguished phenotypic borders, highlighting their diagnostic utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.