Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37578988›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

Non-asymptotic transients away from steady states determine cellular responsiveness to dynamic spatial-temporal signals.

Akhilesh Nandan, Aneta Koseska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Polarization as a Process: The Potential of Process Ontology for Understanding Cellular Symmetry Breaking.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dynamical systems of fate and form in development.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akhilesh NandanCellular computations and learning, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, Bonn, Germany.
Aneta KoseskaCellular computations and learning, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4263-2340

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Majority of the theory on cell polarization and the understanding of cellular sensing and responsiveness to localized chemical cues has been based on the idea that non-polarized and polarized cell states can be represented by stable asymptotic switching between them. The existing model classes that describe the dynamics of signaling networks underlying polarization are formulated within the framework of autonomous systems. However these models do not simultaneously capture both, robust maintenance of polarized state longer than the signal duration, and retained responsiveness to signals with complex spatial-temporal distribution. Based on recent experimental evidence for criticality organization of biochemical networks, we challenge the current concepts and demonstrate that non-asymptotic signaling dynamics arising at criticality uniquely ensures optimal responsiveness to changing chemoattractant fields. We provide a framework to characterize non-asymptotic dynamics of system's state trajectories through a non-autonomous treatment of the system, further emphasizing the importance of (long) transient dynamics, as well as the necessity to change the mathematical formalism when describing biological systems that operate in changing environments.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionMathematics

Identifiers

PMID37578988
PMCPMC10449117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.