ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2023
Ideal Observer Computation by Use of Markov-Chain Monte Carlo With Generative Adversarial Networks.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ideal observer estimation for binary tasks with stochastic object models.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Approximating the ideal observer for joint signal detection and estimation tasks by the use of Markov-Chain Monte Carlo with generative adversarial networks.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Dependence of observer task on conclusions drawn fromJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Approximating the Hotelling observer with autoencoder-learned efficient channels for binary signal detection tasks.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical imaging systems are often evaluated and optimized via objective, or task-specific, measures of image quality (IQ) that quantify the performance of an observer on a specific clinically-relevant task. The performance of the Bayesian Ideal Observer (IO) sets an upper limit among all observers, numerical or human, and has been advocated for use as a figure-of-merit (FOM) for evaluating and optimizing medical imaging systems. However, the IO test statistic corresponds to the likelihood ratio that is intractable to compute in the majority of cases. A sampling-based method that employs Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques was previously proposed to estimate the IO performance. However, current applications of MCMC methods for IO approximation have been limited to a small number of situations where the considered distribution of to-be-imaged objects can be described by a relatively simple stochastic object model (SOM). As such, there remains an important need to extend the domain of applicability of MCMC methods to address a large variety of scenarios where IO-based assessments are needed but the associated SOMs have not been available. In this study, a novel MCMC method that employs a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based SOM, referred to as MCMC-GAN, is described and evaluated. The MCMC-GAN method was quantitatively validated by use of test-cases for which reference solutions were available. The results demonstrate that the MCMC-GAN method can extend the domain of applicability of MCMC methods for conducting IO analyses of medical imaging systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.