Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37578830›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2023

The Role of Large Language Models in Medical Education: Applications and Implications.

Conrad W Safranek, Anne Elizabeth Sidamon-Eristoff, Aidan Gilson, David Chartash

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Conrad W SafranekSection for Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1985-9432
Anne Elizabeth Sidamon-EristoffYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7422-9703
Aidan GilsonSection for Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4770-4705
David ChartashSection for Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-330X

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM136651 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BARBARA I KAZMIERCZAK · 2020 to 2026
$16.5M
Short-Term Reserch Training: Students in Health SchoolsT35HL007649 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Sarwat I Chaudhry, Erica L Herzog · 1987 to 2026
$5.7M
Short Term Research Training: Students in Health Professional SchoolsT35DK104689 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LLOYD G CANTLEY, Sarwat I Chaudhry · 2015 to 2026
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007649NIDDK NIH HHS T35 DK104689NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM136651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have sparked extensive discourse within the medical education community, spurring both excitement and apprehension. Written from the perspective of medical students, this editorial offers insights gleaned through immersive interactions with ChatGPT, contextualized by ongoing research into the imminent role of LLMs in health care. Three distinct positive use cases for ChatGPT were identified: facilitating differential diagnosis brainstorming, providing interactive practice cases, and aiding in multiple-choice question review. These use cases can effectively help students learn foundational medical knowledge during the preclinical curriculum while reinforcing the learning of core Entrustable Professional Activities. Simultaneously, we highlight key limitations of LLMs in medical education, including their insufficient ability to teach the integration of contextual and external information, comprehend sensory and nonverbal cues, cultivate rapport and interpersonal interaction, and align with overarching medical education and patient care goals. Through interacting with LLMs to augment learning during medical school, students can gain an understanding of their strengths and weaknesses. This understanding will be pivotal as we navigate a health care landscape increasingly intertwined with LLMs and artificial intelligence.

Indexed as

AIartificial intelligence in health careautoethnographyChatGPTlarge language modelsLLMmedical education

Identifiers

PMID37578830
PMCPMC10463084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.