Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37578796›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Development of a Multilevel Model to Identify Patients at Risk for Delay in Starting Cancer Treatment.

Zachary A K Frosch, Jill Hasler, Elizabeth Handorf, Tesla DuBois, Richard J Bleicher, Martin J Edelman, Daniel M Geynisman, Michael J Hall, Carolyn Y Fang, Shannon M Lynch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. "Cancer's a demon": a qualitative study of fear and multilevel factors contributing to cancer treatment delays.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zachary A K FroschDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jill HaslerDepartment of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Elizabeth HandorfCancer Prevention and Control Research Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Tesla DuBoisCancer Prevention and Control Research Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Richard J BleicherDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Martin J EdelmanDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Daniel M GeynismanDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Michael J HallDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Carolyn Y FangCancer Prevention and Control Research Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Shannon M LynchCancer Prevention and Control Research Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Fox Chase Cancer Center · US

Funding

CANCER RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009615 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Gregory L Beatty, MICHAEL D HOGARTY · 1988 to 2026
$10.4M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Delays in starting cancer treatment disproportionately affect vulnerable populations and can influence patients' experience and outcomes. Machine learning algorithms incorporating electronic health record (EHR) data and neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDOH) measures may identify at-risk patients. Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning model for estimating the probability of a treatment delay using multilevel data sources. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study evaluated 4 different machine learning approaches for estimating the likelihood of a treatment delay greater than 60 days (group least absolute shrinkage and selection operator [LASSO], bayesian additive regression tree, gradient boosting, and random forest). Criteria for selecting between approaches were discrimination, calibration, and interpretability/simplicity. The multilevel data set included clinical, demographic, and neighborhood-level census data derived from the EHR, cancer registry, and American Community Survey. Patients with invasive breast, lung, colorectal, bladder, or kidney cancer diagnosed from 2013 to 2019 and treated at a comprehensive cancer center were included. Data analysis was performed from January 2022 to June 2023. Exposures: Variables included demographics, cancer characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory values, imaging orders, and neighborhood variables. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome estimated by machine learning models was likelihood of a delay greater than 60 days between cancer diagnosis and treatment initiation. The primary metric used to evaluate model performance was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Results: A total of 6409 patients were included (mean [SD] age, 62.8 [12.5] years; 4321 [67.4%] female; 2576 [40.2%] with breast cancer, 1738 [27.1%] with lung cancer, and 1059 [16.5%] with kidney cancer). A total of 1621 (25.3%) experienced a delay greater than 60 days. The selected group LASSO model had an AUC-ROC of 0.713 (95% CI, 0.679-0.745). Lower likelihood of delay was seen with diagnosis at the treating institution; first malignant neoplasm; Asian or Pacific Islander or White race; private insurance; and lacking comorbidities. Greater likelihood of delay was seen at the extremes of neighborhood deprivation. Model performance (AUC-ROC) was lower in Black patients, patients with race and ethnicity other than non-Hispanic White, and those living in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods. Though the model selected neighborhood SDOH variables as contributing variables, performance was similar when fit with and without these variables. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, a machine learning model incorporating EHR and SDOH data was able to estimate the likelihood of delays in starting cancer therapy. Future work should focus on additional ways to incorporate SDOH data to improve model performance, particularly in vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsBayes TheoremCohort StudiesHumansMiddle AgedRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID37578796
PMCPMC10425824
OpenAlexW4385799185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.