Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37578735›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2023

How future surgery will benefit from SARS-COV-2-related measures: a SPIGC survey conveying the perspective of Italian surgeons.

Leandro Siragusa, Roberta Angelico, Marco Angrisani, Biagio Zampogna, Marco Materazzo, Roberto Sorge, Luca Giordano, Roberto Meniconi, Alessandro Coppola, SPIGC Survey Collaborative Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leandro Siragusa *Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Roberta Angelico *HPB and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of "Rome Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Marco AngrisaniDepartment of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Biagio ZampognaOperative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Marco MaterazzoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy. mrcmaterazzo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3599-061X
Roberto SorgeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Luca GiordanoDepartment of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Roberto Meniconi *Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro Coppola *Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
SPIGC Survey Collaborative Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 negatively affected surgical activity, but the potential benefits resulting from adopted measures remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in surgical activity and potential benefit from COVID-19 measures in perspective of Italian surgeons on behalf of SPIGC. A nationwide online survey on surgical practice before, during, and after COVID-19 pandemic was conducted in March-April 2022 (NCT:05323851). Effects of COVID-19 hospital-related measures on surgical patients' management and personal professional development across surgical specialties were explored. Data on demographics, pre-operative/peri-operative/post-operative management, and professional development were collected. Outcomes were matched with the corresponding volume. Four hundred and seventy-three respondents were included in final analysis across 14 surgical specialties. Since SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, application of telematic consultations (4.1% vs. 21.6%; p < 0.0001) and diagnostic evaluations (16.4% vs. 42.2%; p < 0.0001) increased. Elective surgical activities significantly reduced and surgeons opted more frequently for conservative management with a possible indication for elective (26.3% vs. 35.7%; p < 0.0001) or urgent (20.4% vs. 38.5%; p < 0.0001) surgery. All new COVID-related measures are perceived to be maintained in the future. Surgeons' personal education online increased from 12.6% (pre-COVID) to 86.6% (post-COVID; p < 0.0001). Online educational activities are considered a beneficial effect from COVID pandemic (56.4%). COVID-19 had a great impact on surgical specialties, with significant reduction of operation volume. However, some forced changes turned out to be benefits. Isolation measures pushed the use of telemedicine and telemetric devices for outpatient practice and favored communication for educational purposes and surgeon-patient/family communication. From the Italian surgeons' perspective, COVID-related measures will continue to influence future surgical clinical practice.

Indexed as

COVID-19SurgeonsHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19 pandemicSurgical managementSurgical trainingSurveyTraineeTraining program

Identifiers

PMID37578735
PMCPMC10435629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.