Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37578682›Full record

ArticleAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2023

Assessing real-time positive subjective effects of alcohol using high-resolution ecological momentary assessment in risky versus light drinkers.

Daniel J Fridberg, Zoe Lee, Andrew M Fischer, John F Cursio, Andrea C King

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel J FridbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3451-1418
Zoe LeeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Andrew M FischerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
John F CursioDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Andrea C KingDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5943-7109
University of Chicago · USChicago Department of Public Health · US

Funding

Alcohol Stimulation and Sedation in Binge Drinkers - Renewal 01R01AA013746 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DANIEL J FRIDBERG, ANDREA C KING · 2003 to 2026
$11.6M
Natural environment assessment of alcohol responses in risky drinkersR21AA029746 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI FRIDBERG, DANIEL J, KING, ANDREA C · 2022 to 2023
$446k
NIAAA NIH HHS 1R21 AA029746-01A1NIAAA NIH HHS 5R01 AA013746-19NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013746NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA029746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-resolution ecological momentary assessment (HR-EMA) can assess acute alcohol responses during naturalistic heavy drinking episodes. The goal of this study was to use HR-EMA to examine drinking behavior and subjective responses to alcohol in risky drinkers (moderate-severe alcohol use disorder [MS-AUD], heavy social drinkers [HD]) and light drinkers (LD). We expected that risky drinkers would endorse greater alcohol stimulation and reward, with lower sedation, than LD, even when controlling for amount of alcohol consumed.

methodsParticipants (N = 112; 54% male, M ± SD age = 27.2 ± 4.2 years) completed smartphone-based HR-EMA during one typical alcohol drinking occasion and one non-alcohol-drinking occasion in their natural environment. Participants were prompted to complete next-day surveys that assessed drinking-related outcomes, study acceptability, and safety.

resultsHR-EMA prompt completion rates were excellent (92% and 89% for the alcohol and nonalcohol episodes, respectively). The MS-AUD group consumed the most alcohol with the highest estimated blood alcohol concentration (eBAC) by the end of the alcohol drinking episode (0.14 g/dL) versus LD (0.02 g/dL), with HD intermediate (0.10 g/dL). Relative to LD, MS-AUD and HD endorsed greater positive effects of alcohol (stimulation, liking, and wanting).

conclusionsThis study is the first to use HR-EMA to measure and compare real-world acute alcohol responses across diverse drinker subgroups, including persons with MS-AUD. Results demonstrate that risky drinkers experience heightened pleasurable effects measured in real-time during natural-environment alcohol responses. Rather than drinking excessively to eventually achieve desirable subjective effects, risky drinkers show sensitivity to positive alcohol effects throughout a heavy drinking episode.

Indexed as

alcohol use disorderheavy drinkinghigh-resolution ecological momentary assessmentstimulationsubjective responses

Identifiers

PMID37578682
PMCPMC10843682
OpenAlexW4385797944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.