Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37578629›Full record

Observational studyNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

Medical versus neurosurgical treatment in ICH patients: a single center experience.

P Pierini, Agnese Novelli, F Bossi, R Corinaldesi, M Paciaroni, M G Mosconi, A Alberti, M Venti, I Leone de Magistris, V Caso

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

P PieriniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Città Di Castello Hospital, Città Di Castello, Italy.
Agnese NovelliInternal, Vascular and Emergency Medicine-Stroke Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia University of Perugia, 06139, Perugia, Italy. agnese.novelli92@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4249-0841
F BossiInternal, Vascular and Emergency Medicine-Stroke Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia University of Perugia, 06139, Perugia, Italy.
R CorinaldesiNeurosurgery Department, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
M PaciaroniStroke Unit, Santa Maria Della Misericordia, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
M G MosconiStroke Unit, Santa Maria Della Misericordia, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
A AlbertiStroke Unit, Santa Maria Della Misericordia, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
M VentiStroke Unit, Santa Maria Della Misericordia, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
I Leone de MagistrisStroke Unit, Santa Maria Della Misericordia, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
V CasoStroke Unit, Santa Maria Della Misericordia, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
University of Perugia · ITCittà di Castello Hospital · ITOspedale Santa Maria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe effect of surgical treatment for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains uncertain. We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study on supra-centimeter spontaneous ICH treated with either neurosurgical or conservative management. The baseline demographics and risk factors were correlated with in-hospital mortality and 3 and 6-month survival rates stratified by management.

methodsWe included all patients with evidence of spontaneous ICH > 1 cm detected by CT and admitted between august 2020 and march 2021 to the "SMM" Hospital in Perugia.

resultsOnehundredandtwentytwo patients were included in the study, and 45% (n.55) were surgically treated. The mean age was 71.9 ± 15.3, and 61% (n.75) were males. Intra-hospital mortality ended up being 31% (n.38), 3 months-survival was 63% (n.77) and 6 months-survival was 60% (n.73). From the multivariate analysis of the surgical patients versus medical patient, we observed that the surgical patients were younger (67.5 ± 14.9 vs 75.5 ± 14.7 y; OR 0.87; Cl 95% 0.85-0.94; p 0.001), with greater ICH volume at the onset (61 ± 39.4 cc vs 51 ± 64 cc; OR 1.03; Cl 95% 1.005-1.07; p 0.05), more midline shift (7.61 ± 5.54 mm vs 4.09 ± 5.88 mm; OR 1.37; Cl 95% 1.045-1.79; p 0.023), and a higher ICH score (3 vs 2 mean ICH score; OR 21.12; Cl 95% 2.6-170.6; p 0.004). Intra-hospital mortality in the surgical group and in the conservative treatment group was respectively 33% vs 30%, 3 month-survival was 64% vs 63% and 6 month- survival were 60% in both groups.

conclusionsOur patient cohort shows no overall benefit from surgery over conservative treatment, but surgical patients were younger and had larger ICH volume.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHaemorrhageICHNeurosurgerySurgeryTherapy

Identifiers

PMID37578629
PMCPMC10761447
OpenAlexW4385798888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.