Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37578427›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023

Multicenter Validation of Deep Learning Algorithm ROP.AI for the Automated Diagnosis of Plus Disease in ROP.

Amelia Bai, Shuan Dai, Jacky Hung, Aditi Kirpalani, Heather Russell, James Elder, Shaheen Shah, Christopher Carty, Zachary Tan

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Novel semi-automated system for multi-dimensional analysis of macular neovascularization: quantitative biomarkers and rule-based morphological categorization across OCTA platforms.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Amelia BaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Shuan DaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jacky HungCentre for Children's Health Research, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Aditi KirpalaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Heather RussellDepartment of Ophthalmology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
James ElderDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Shaheen ShahMater Misericordiae, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Christopher CartyGriffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Australia.
Zachary TanAegis Ventures, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Griffith University · AUBond University · AUGold Coast Hospital · AUMater Misericordiae Hospital · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a sight-threatening vasoproliferative retinal disease affecting premature infants. The detection of plus disease, a severe form of ROP requiring treatment, remains challenging owing to subjectivity, frequency, and time intensity of retinal examinations. Recent artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms developed to detect plus disease aims to alleviate these challenges; however, they have not been tested against a diverse neonatal population. Our study aims to validate ROP.AI, an AI algorithm developed from a single cohort, against a multicenter Australian cohort to determine its performance in detecting plus disease. Methods: Retinal images captured during routine ROP screening from May 2021 to February 2022 across five major tertiary centers throughout Australia were collected and uploaded to ROP.AI. AI diagnostic output was compared with one of five ROP experts. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operator curve were determined. Results: We collected 8052 images. The area under the receiver operator curve for the diagnosis of plus disease was 0.75. ROP.AI achieved 84% sensitivity, 43% specificity, and 96% negative predictive value for the detection of plus disease after operating point optimization. Conclusions: ROP.AI was able to detect plus disease in an external, multicenter cohort despite being trained from a single center. Algorithm performance was demonstrated without preprocessing or augmentation, simulating real-world clinical applicability. Further training may improve generalizability for clinical implementation. Translational Relevance: These results demonstrate ROP.AI's potential as a screening tool for the detection of plus disease in future clinical practice and provides a solution to overcome current diagnostic challenges.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRetinopathy of PrematurityAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceAustraliaGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID37578427
PMCPMC10431208
OpenAlexW4385798951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.