ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023
Multicenter Validation of Deep Learning Algorithm ROP.AI for the Automated Diagnosis of Plus Disease in ROP.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing widefield and ultra-widefield optical coherence tomography angiography with fluorescein angiography in diabetic retinopathy: a review.International ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Novel semi-automated system for multi-dimensional analysis of macular neovascularization: quantitative biomarkers and rule-based morphological categorization across OCTA platforms.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Multisource Machine Learning Model for Detecting Referral-Warranted Retinopathy of Prematurity.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Explainability-informed patient-disjoint evaluation of deep learning for plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity with an ophthalmologist reader study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A novel method of quantifying retinal vascular tortuosity in retinopathy of prematurity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- AI models in clinical neonatology: a review of modeling approaches and a consensus proposal for standardized reporting of model performance.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP): An Overview of Biomarkers in Various Samples for Prediction, Diagnosis, and Prognosis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Novel Approaches for Early Detection of Retinal Diseases Using Artificial Intelligence.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- OCT angiography 2023 update: focus on diabetic retinopathy.Acta diabetologica · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a sight-threatening vasoproliferative retinal disease affecting premature infants. The detection of plus disease, a severe form of ROP requiring treatment, remains challenging owing to subjectivity, frequency, and time intensity of retinal examinations. Recent artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms developed to detect plus disease aims to alleviate these challenges; however, they have not been tested against a diverse neonatal population. Our study aims to validate ROP.AI, an AI algorithm developed from a single cohort, against a multicenter Australian cohort to determine its performance in detecting plus disease. Methods: Retinal images captured during routine ROP screening from May 2021 to February 2022 across five major tertiary centers throughout Australia were collected and uploaded to ROP.AI. AI diagnostic output was compared with one of five ROP experts. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operator curve were determined. Results: We collected 8052 images. The area under the receiver operator curve for the diagnosis of plus disease was 0.75. ROP.AI achieved 84% sensitivity, 43% specificity, and 96% negative predictive value for the detection of plus disease after operating point optimization. Conclusions: ROP.AI was able to detect plus disease in an external, multicenter cohort despite being trained from a single center. Algorithm performance was demonstrated without preprocessing or augmentation, simulating real-world clinical applicability. Further training may improve generalizability for clinical implementation. Translational Relevance: These results demonstrate ROP.AI's potential as a screening tool for the detection of plus disease in future clinical practice and provides a solution to overcome current diagnostic challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.