Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37578425›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023

Rod and Cone Function Measured Objectively by Chromatic Pupil Campimetry Show a Different Preservation Between Distinct Genotypes in Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Carina Kelbsch, Melanie Kempf, Ronja Jung, Friederike Kortüm, Milda Reith, Laura Kuehlewein, Susanne Kohl, Torsten Strasser, Tobias Peters, Helmut Wilhelm and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The role of full-field stimulus threshold in evaluating Bietti crystalline dystrophy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carina KelbschUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Melanie KempfUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Ronja JungUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Friederike KortümUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Milda ReithUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Laura KuehleweinUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Susanne KohlInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Torsten StrasserUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Tobias PetersPupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Helmut WilhelmUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Barbara WilhelmPupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Krunoslav StinglUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Katarina StinglUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
STZ eyetrial · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Verifying whether specific genotypes causing retinitis pigmentosa (RP) show differences in the preservation of rod and cone function measured by chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC). Methods: Sixty-three RP eyes (37 male, 14-58 years) were measured using CPC with specific photopic and scotopic protocols, and the relative maximal constriction amplitudes and latencies to constriction onset were analyzed per genotype (RP due to variants in EYS, n = 14; PDE6A, n = 10; RPE65, n = 15; USH2A, n = 10; and RPGR, n = 14). Correlation analyses between the pupillary responses were performed with age, full-field stimulus threshold (FST), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for cones and rods, respectively, to the genotype. Results: Pupillary responses were most severely reduced in RPE65-RP. Patients with disease-associated variants in EYS and USH2A were accompanied with better-preserved rod function compared with the other subgroups, reaching statistical significance between EYS and RPE65. Cone function was statistically significantly correlated with age in USH2A-RP with an annual decline of 2.4%. Correlations of pupillary responses were found with FST but barely with the ellipsoid zone area in OCT. Latency was significantly more prolonged in RPE65-RP compared with the other genotypes for cones. Conclusions: Rod and cone function measured objectively by CPC showed a different preservation between genotypes in RP. However, heterogeneity inside the same genotype was present. CPC data correlated with FST, but structural OCT parameters seem to be limited indicators for photoreceptor function in RP. Prolonged time dynamics for cones in RPE65 mutations suggest an impact on cone processing and might provide additional information in the evaluation of therapy effects.

Indexed as

Retinitis PigmentosaVisual Field TestsCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 6ElectroretinographyEye ProteinsGenotypeHumansMalePupilRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 6Eye ProteinsEYS protein, humanPDE6A protein, humanRPGR protein, human

Identifiers

PMID37578425
PMCPMC10431211
OpenAlexW4385798051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.