ArticleThe European journal of general practice2023
Series: Public engagement with research. Part 1: The fundamentals of public engagement with research.
Article in The European journal of general practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Mainstream Influence of Cardiothoracic Surgical Research: An Analysis of Google Trends Data from 2004 to 2024.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Beyond the dataset: integrating public voices in data science.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Evaluating the experiences of Vietnamese university students enrolled in a longitudinal research cohort: a journey mapping approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Training Program to Support Patient Engagement in Primary Health Care Research: Co-Design, Implementation, and Evaluation Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- Patient and family engagement interventions for enhancing patient safety in the perioperative journey: a scoping review.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Digital Information Exchange Between the Public and Researchers in Health Studies: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Review
- Development and validation of a pragmatic measure of cocreation in research engagement: a study protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Looking back at the EJGP in 2023: What a rich harvest of relevant publications for primary care medicine!The European journal of general practice · 2024Article
- Series: Public engagement with research. Part 3: Sharing power and building trust through partnering with communities in primary care research.The European journal of general practice · 2024Article
- Series: Public engagement with research. Part 2: GPs and primary care researchers working inclusively with minoritised communities in health research to help address inequalities.The European journal of general practice · 2024Article
- Is it still worth writing a research paper in 2024?Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2024Article
- Using the UK standards for public involvement to evaluate the public involvement sections of annual reports from NIHR managed research centres.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the first of a four-part series, we describe the fundamentals of public engagement in primary care research.
objectivesThe article's purpose is to encourage, inform and improve the researcher's awareness about public engagement in research. For a growing number of researchers, funders and patient organisations in Europe, public engagement is a moral and ethical imperative for conducting high-quality research. DISCUSSION: Starting with an explanation of the role of public engagement in research, we highlight its diversity and benefits to research, researchers and the public members involved. We summarise principles of good practice and provide valuable resources for researchers to use in their public engagement activities. Finally, we discuss some of the issues encountered when researchers collaborate with members of the public and provide practical steps to address them. Case studies of real-life situations are used to illustrate and aid understanding.
conclusionWe hope this article and the other papers in this series will encourage researchers to better consider the role and practice of public engagement and the potential added value to research that collaborating with the public could provide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.