Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37578123›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2023

Building Block-Based Binding Predictions for DNA-Encoded Libraries.

Chris Zhang, Mary Pitman, Anjali Dixit, Sumudu Leelananda, Henri Palacci, Meghan Lawler, Svetlana Belyanskaya, LaShadric Grady, Joe Franklin, Nicolas Tilmans and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Building Block-Centric Approach to DNA-Encoded Library Design.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chris ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, 1120 Natural Sciences II, Irvine, California 92697, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7298-7145
Mary PitmanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, 856 Health Sciences Road, Irvine, California 92697, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2613-5769
Anjali DixitDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, 856 Health Sciences Road, Irvine, California 92697, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4997-8005
Sumudu LeelanandaAnagenex, 20 Maguire Road Suite 302, Lexington, Massachusetts 02421, United States.
Henri PalacciAnagenex, 20 Maguire Road Suite 302, Lexington, Massachusetts 02421, United States.
Meghan LawlerAnagenex, 20 Maguire Road Suite 302, Lexington, Massachusetts 02421, United States.
Svetlana BelyanskayaAnagenex, 20 Maguire Road Suite 302, Lexington, Massachusetts 02421, United States.
LaShadric GradyAnagenex, 20 Maguire Road Suite 302, Lexington, Massachusetts 02421, United States.
Joe FranklinAnagenex, 20 Maguire Road Suite 302, Lexington, Massachusetts 02421, United States.
Nicolas TilmansAnagenex, 20 Maguire Road Suite 302, Lexington, Massachusetts 02421, United States.
David L MobleyDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, 1120 Natural Sciences II, Irvine, California 92697, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1083-5533

Funding

Computational alchemy for molecular design and optimizationR01GM108889 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MOBLEY, DAVID LOWELL · 2014 to 2022
$2.5M
Accelerating drug discovery via ML-guided iterative design and optimizationR35GM148236 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI David Lowell Mobley · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108889NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA-encoded libraries (DELs) provide the means to make and screen millions of diverse compounds against a target of interest in a single experiment. However, despite producing large volumes of binding data at a relatively low cost, the DEL selection process is susceptible to noise, necessitating computational follow-up to increase signal-to-noise ratios. In this work, we present a set of informatics tools to employ data from prior DEL screen(s) to gain information about which building blocks are most likely to be productive when designing new DELs for the same target. We demonstrate that similar building blocks have similar probabilities of forming compounds that bind. We then build a model from the inference that the combined behavior of individual building blocks is predictive of whether an overall compound binds. We illustrate our approach on a set of three-cycle OpenDEL libraries screened against soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) and report performance of more than an order of magnitude greater than random guessing on a holdout set, demonstrating that our model can serve as a baseline for comparison against other machine learning models on DEL data. Lastly, we provide a discussion on how we believe this informatics workflow could be applied to benefit researchers in their specific DEL campaigns.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoverySmall Molecule LibrariesDNAMachine LearningDNASmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID37578123
PMCPMC10466377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.