Trial reportStroke2023
Electric Field Navigated 1-Hz rTMS for Poststroke Motor Recovery: The E-FIT Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Stroke, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03010462 (A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Sham-controlled Trial to Determine the Therapeutic Effects of Navigation Guided 1 hz Rtms Administered to the Contralesional Hemisphere as Adjuvant to Task-oriented Rehabilitation in Patients With Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Sham-controlled Trial to Determine the Therapeutic Effects of Navigation Guided 1 hz Rtms Administered to the Contralesional Hemisphere as Adjuvant to Task-oriented Rehabilitation in Patients With Ischemic Stroke
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor function in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Improving postsurgical paresis in brain tumor patients by transcranial magnetic stimulation.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Trial
- Effects of Navigated rTMS on Post-Stroke Upper-Limb Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at different targets on brain function in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Advances in Stroke Neurorehabilitation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo determine if low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting the primary motor cortex contralateral (M1
methodsThe present E-FIT trial (Electric Field Navigated 1Hz rTMS for Post-stroke Motor Recovery Trial) included 5 of 12 NICHE trial outpatient US rehabilitation centers. The stimulation protocol remained identical (1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, M1
resultsOf 60 participants randomized, 58 completed treatment and were included for analysis. Bayesian analysis of combined data from the E-FIT and the NICHE trials indicated that active treatment was not superior to sham at the primary end point (posterior mean odds ratio of 1.94 [96% credible interval of 0.61-4.80]). For the E-FIT intent-to-treat population, upper extremity Fugl-Meyer improvement ≥5 pts occurred in 60% (18/30) active group and 50% (14/28) sham group. Participants enrolled 3 to 6 months following stroke had a 67% (31%-91% CI) response rate in the active group at the 6-month end point versus 50% in the sham group (21.5%-78.5% CI). There were significant improvements from baseline to 6 months for both active and sham groups in upper extremity Fugl-Meyer, Action Research Arm Test, and EQ-5D (
conclusionsIntensive motor rehabilitation 3 to 12 months after stroke improved clinical impairment, function, and quality of life; however, 1 Hz-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation was not an effective treatment adjuvant in the present sample population with mixed lesion location and extent. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03010462.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.