ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Acetic acid is a superior ion pairing modifier for sub-nanogram and single cell proteomics.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A recent study demonstrated a substantial increase in peptide signal and corresponding proteome coverage when employing 0.5% acetic acid (AA) as the ion pairing modifier in place of the 0.1% formic acid traditionally used in shotgun proteomics. In this study, we investigated the effect of modifier in the context of sub-nanogram and single cell proteomics (SCP). We first evaluated a tryptic digest standard down to 20 picograms total load on column on a TIMSTOF SCP system. In line with the previous results, we observed a signal increase when using AA, leading to increased proteome coverage at every peptide load assessed. Relative improvements were more apparent at lower concentrations, with a 20 picogram peptide digest demonstrating a striking 1.8-fold increase to over 2,000 protein groups identified in a 30 minute analysis. Furthermore, we find that this increase in signal can be leveraged to reduce ramp times, leading to 1.7x more scans across each peak and improvements in quantification as measured by %CVs. When evaluating single cancer cells, approximately 13% more peptide groups were identified on average when employing AA in the place of FA. All vendor raw and processed data are available through ProteomeXchange as PXD046002 and PXD051590.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.