Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37577691›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

SAMPLER: Empirical distribution representations for rapid analysis of whole slide tissue images.

Patience Mukashyaka, Todd B Sheridan, Ali Foroughi Pour, Jeffrey H Chuang

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patience MukashyakaThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT.
Todd B SheridanThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT.
Ali Foroughi PourThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT.
Jeffrey H ChuangThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT.

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
Quantitative Computational Methods to Accurately Measure Tumor Heterogeneity in Solid Tumors to Inform Development of Evolution-based Treatment StrategiesR01CA230031 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI CHUANG, JEFFREY HSU-MIN · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NCI NIH HHS R01 CA230031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning has revolutionized digital pathology, allowing for automatic analysis of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained whole slide images (WSIs) for diverse tasks. In such analyses, WSIs are typically broken into smaller images called tiles, and a neural network backbone encodes each tile in a feature space. Many recent works have applied attention based deep learning models to aggregate tile-level features into a slide-level representation, which is then used for slide-level prediction tasks. However, training attention models is computationally intensive, necessitating hyperparameter optimization and specialized training procedures. Here, we propose SAMPLER, a fully statistical approach to generate efficient and informative WSI representations by encoding the empirical cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of multiscale tile features. We demonstrate that SAMPLER-based classifiers are as accurate or better than state-of-the-art fully deep learning attention models for classification tasks including distinction of: subtypes of breast carcinoma (BRCA: AUC=0.911 ± 0.029); subtypes of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC: AUC=0.940±0.018); and subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC: AUC=0.987±0.006). A major advantage of the SAMPLER representation is that predictive models are >100X faster compared to attention models. Histopathological review confirms that SAMPLER-identified high attention tiles contain tumor morphological features specific to the tumor type, while low attention tiles contain fibrous stroma, blood, or tissue folding artifacts. We further apply SAMPLER concepts to improve the design of attention-based neural networks, yielding a context aware multi-head attention model with increased accuracy for subtype classification within BRCA and RCC (BRCA: AUC=0.921±0.027, and RCC: AUC=0.988±0.010). Finally, we provide theoretical results identifying sufficient conditions for which SAMPLER is optimal. SAMPLER is a fast and effective approach for analyzing WSIs, with greatly improved scalability over attention methods to benefit digital pathology analysis.

Identifiers

PMID37577691
PMCPMC10418159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.