ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023
Effects of
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The application potential ofIMA fungus · 2026Review
- Characterization of Two Potential BiocontrolMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Antifungal Activity of Rhizosphere Bacillus Isolated fromMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Biocontrol agents transform the stability and functional characteristics of the grape phyllosphere microenvironment.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rose black spot is an economically important disease that significantly decreases flower yield. Fungicide and biological control are effective approaches for controlling rose black spot. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of application of biological and chemical control agents, including Methods: In this study, the Results and discussion: Both disease incidence and disease index differed significantly among groups (LKW < GUAL210 < CP < CK), and disease control effect exhibited no significant difference between GUAL210 and LKW (60.96% and 63.86%, respectively). Biological control was superior to chemical control in terms of disease prevention effects and duration, and it significantly increased the number of branches and flowers of rose plants. Ascomycota and Basidiomycota accounted for more than 74% of the total fungal abundance, and the abundance of Ascomycota was highest in CK, followed by GUAL210, CP and LKW, which was consistent with the disease occurrence in each group. The analysis of metabolic pathways showed that the HSERMETANA-PWY in each experimental group was significantly lower than that in control group. The Shannon index in each experimental group was significantly lower than that in control group. PCoA analysis showed that the rhizosphere fungal community structure in each experimental group was significantly different from that in control group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.