Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37577399›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2023

Combined genome-wide association studies and expression quantitative trait locus analysis uncovers a genetic regulatory network of floral organ number in a tree peony (

Liping Peng, Yang Li, Wanqing Tan, Shangwei Wu, Qing Hao, Ningning Tong, Zhanying Wang, Zheng'an Liu, Qingyan Shu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. aBIOTECH · 2025
    Review
  5. Unlocking the molecular secrets ofHorticulture research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liping PengKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1609-5433
Yang LiKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-2582
Wanqing TanKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Shangwei WuKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Qing HaoCollege of Landscape Architecture and Forestry, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6396-8663
Ningning TongKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Zhanying WangPeony Research Institute, Luoyang Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Luoyang 471000, China.
Zheng'an LiuKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Qingyan ShuKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3742-6713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Great progress has been made in our understanding of floral organ identity determination and its regulatory network in many species; however, the quantitative genetic basis of floral organ number variation is far less well understood for species-specific traits from the perspective of population variation. Here, using a tree peony (

Identifiers

PMID37577399
PMCPMC10419549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.