Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37577306›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2023

Radiomic signature accurately predicts the risk of metastatic dissemination in late-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Agata Małgorzata Wilk, Emilia Kozłowska, Damian Borys, Andrea D'Amico, Krzysztof Fujarewicz, Izabela Gorczewska, Iwona Debosz-Suwinska, Rafał Suwinski, Jarosław Smieja, Andrzej Swierniak

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Agata Małgorzata Wilk *Department of Systems Biology and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.
Emilia Kozłowska *Department of Systems Biology and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.
Damian BorysDepartment of Systems Biology and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.
Andrea D'AmicoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, PET Diagnostics Unit, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Krzysztof FujarewiczDepartment of Systems Biology and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.
Izabela GorczewskaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, PET Diagnostics Unit, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Iwona Debosz-SuwinskaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Rafał SuwinskiII Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Clinic, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Jarosław SmiejaDepartment of Systems Biology and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.
Andrzej SwierniakDepartment of Systems Biology and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLSilesian University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, and the median overall survival (OS) is approximately 2-3 years among patients with stage III disease. Furthermore, it is one of the deadliest types of cancer globally due to non-specific symptoms and the lack of a biomarker for early detection. The most important decision that clinicians need to make after a lung cancer diagnosis is the selection of a treatment schedule. This decision is based on, among others factors, the risk of developing metastasis. Methods: A cohort of 115 NSCLC patients treated using chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) with curative intent was retrospectively collated and included patients for whom positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images, acquired before RT, were available. The PET/CT images were used to compute radiomic features extracted from a region of interest (ROI), the primary tumor. Radiomic and clinical features were then classified to stratify the patients into short and long time to metastasis, and regression analysis was used to predict the risk of metastasis. Results: Classification based on binarized metastasis-free survival (MFS) was applied with moderate success. Indeed, an accuracy of 0.73 was obtained for the selection of features based on the Wilcoxon test and logistic regression model. However, the Cox regression model for metastasis risk prediction performed very well, with a concordance index (C-index) score equal to 0.84. Conclusions: It is possible to accurately predict the risk of metastasis in NSCLC patients based on radiomic features. The results demonstrate the potential use of features extracted from cancer imaging in predicting the risk of metastasis.

Indexed as

classificationCox regressionmetastasisNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)radiomics

Identifiers

PMID37577306
PMCPMC10413035
OpenAlexW4385306333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.