ArticleCureus2023
Parents' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Regarding Traditional Medicine on Their Children: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study in Bisha City, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The use of traditional medicine (TM) in children is widespread, particularly in developing countries. Parents often rely on TM to treat their children's illnesses or maintain their health. However, the safety and efficacy of TM are often unclear, and there is a need to assess parents' knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward its use. Methods This is a community-based cross-sectional study conducted in Bisha, Saudi Arabia, with a sample size of 555. The study used a modified questionnaire to collect data. The data were collected from March to June 2023. This study involved both descriptive and inferential statistics. Results The study included 555 participants, most of whom were female, Saudi nationals, and married and had a bachelor's degree. More than half of the participants reported using TM, and most believed that it had fewer side effects and could be taken with allopathic medicines. However, many participants did not believe that TM could prevent or cure all diseases or that it was always safe. The median knowledge score was 4.0, with higher scores associated with older age and higher educational level. Most participants had a positive attitude toward TM, with higher attitude scores associated with younger age, male gender, lower educational level, and healthcare-related occupation. The median practice score was 31.0, with higher scores associated with younger age, male gender, illiteracy, and healthcare-related occupation. Overall, the study highlights the importance of understanding the patterns of use, knowledge, attitudes, and practices of TM in the population, particularly among different demographic groups. Conclusions This study highlights the need for better regulation and supervision of TM outlets to ensure the safety and efficacy of the products. It also emphasizes the importance of consulting healthcare professionals before using TM on children. The findings suggest that healthcare providers should be knowledgeable about TM and provide guidance to parents on its appropriate use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.