Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37577254›Full record

ArticleSurgery open science2023

Mentoring approaches in a safe surgery program in Tanzania: Lessons learned during COVID-19 and recommendations for the future.

Laura Fitzgerald, Leopold Tibyehabwa, John Varallo, Edwin Ernest, Anmol Patted, Margaret Mary Bertram, Shehnaz Alidina, Stella Mshana, Adam Katoto, Dorcas Simba and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Laura FitzgeraldJhpiego, 1615 Thames St, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Leopold TibyehabwaSafe Surgery 2020 Project, Jhpiego Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
John VaralloJhpiego, 1615 Thames St, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Edwin ErnestSafe Surgery 2020 Project, Jhpiego Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Anmol PattedJhpiego, 1615 Thames St, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Margaret Mary BertramJhpiego, 1615 Thames St, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Shehnaz AlidinaHarvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States1Current affiliation.
Stella MshanaSafe Surgery 2020 Project, Jhpiego Tanzania, Mara, Tanzania.
Adam KatotoSafe Surgery 2020 Project, Jhpiego Tanzania, Kagera, Tanzania.
Dorcas SimbaSafe Surgery 2020 Project, Jhpiego Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Kevin CharlesAssist International, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Victoria SmithAssist International, Ripon, CA, United States.
Monica CainerAssist International, Ripon, CA, United States.
Augustino HellarSafe Surgery 2020 Project, Jhpiego Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 has dramatically affected the delivery of health care and technical assistance. This is true in Tanzania, where maternal mortality and surgical infection rates are significantly higher than in high-income countries. This paper describes lessons learned about the optimal application of in-person and virtual mentorship in the Safe Surgery 2020 program to improve the quality of surgical services in Tanzania before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: From January 2018 through December 2020, Safe Surgery 2020 supported 40 health facilities in Tanzania's Lake Zone to improve the quality of surgical care. A blended surgical mentorship model, employing both onsite and virtual mentorship, was central to the program's capacity development approach. With COVID-19, the program pivoted to full virtual mentorship. Through continuous learning and adaptation processes, including a human-centered design workshop, surveys assessing mentors' confidence with different competencies, and focus group discussions with mentors, mentees and safe surgery program staff, the program distilled the optimal use of mentorship models. Results: Developing complex surgical skills, addressing contextual considerations, problem-solving, and building trusting relationships were best suited to in-person mentorship, whereas virtual mentorship was most effective in supporting mentees' quality improvement projects, data use, case discussions, and reinforcing clinical practices. Leading successful virtual learning required enhanced facilitation skills and active engagement of health facility leadership. Conclusions: In-person and virtual mentorship offer distinct benefits and complement each other when combined. Investing more in-person mentorship at the beginning of programs allows for the establishment of trust that is foundational to effective mentorship.

Indexed as

Capacity buildingHealth systemsMaternal healthMentorshipObstetricsSurgery

Identifiers

PMID37577254
PMCPMC10413135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.