Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37577245›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Learning Curve of Wrist-level Tendon Repairs Using a Novel Tendon Stapler versus Traditional Suture Methods.

Russell J Hendrycks, Evelyn R Reed, Emily M Graham, Niki K Patel, Megan Rosales, Shaun D Mendenhall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Russell J HendrycksFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Evelyn R ReedFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Emily M GrahamFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Niki K PatelDivision of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Oral Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Megan RosalesDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Shaun D MendenhallDivision of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Oral Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
University of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous effective techniques for primary tendon coaptations exist. However, these techniques are complex and require a substantial amount of training to become proficient. Recently, a novel tendon stapler device (TSD) was developed that could potentially diminish the discrepancies among surgeons of varying levels of training. We hypothesized that the TSD would be easier to learn and would demonstrate improved learning curve efficiencies across participants of differing tendon repair experience compared with traditional suture methods. Participants included a novice, intermediate, and expert in tendon repairs. Comparisons were performed on wrist-level flexors and extensors from human donor arms. The suture repairs were performed with a modified Kessler with a horizontal mattress and were performed in one session on two donor arms by each participant. In a second session, each participant performed the TSD repairs on the matched, contralateral donor arms. Scatterplots fitted with Loess curves, one-way analysis of variance, Tukey pairwise comparisons, two-sided independent samples

Identifiers

PMID37577245
PMCPMC10419657
OpenAlexW4385762267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.