Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37577178›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2023

'You're never pregnant in the same way again': prior early pregnancy loss influences need for health care and support in subsequent pregnancy.

E Koert, T S Hartwig, G M Hviid Malling, L Schmidt, H S Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E KoertDepartment of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9359-7499
T S HartwigDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amager Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4220-5947
G M Hviid MallingDepartment of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1685-9800
L SchmidtDepartment of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9518-1734
H S NielsenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amager Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Unit, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2106-8103
University of Copenhagen · DKHvidovre Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWhat are couples' needs for health care and support in a subsequent pregnancy after prior early pregnancy loss (PL) and how do needs change across the pregnancy? SUMMARY ANSWER: Couples described unmet needs for pregnancy care in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy and were more satisfied with the care provided during the remainder of the pregnancy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Despite early PL being common (∼25% of pregnancies), there is a paucity of research to guide practice to optimize treatment and support future pregnancies. There has been low priority for the issue in research and a pervasive acceptance that couples should 'just try again' after experiencing PL. Women with prior PL report increased anxiety during the first trimester of pregnancy compared to those without previous PL. No longitudinal studies explore what couples' needs are throughout the pregnancy and how these needs shift across time. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This was a qualitative longitudinal dyadic (joint) interview study. In total, 15 couples who were pregnant after a prior PL were interviewed four times over their pregnancy. Couples were recruited from the Copenhagen Pregnancy Loss Cohort Research Programme. Interviews were held in person at the hospital or university, or online. Interviews ranged from 20 to 91 min (mean = 54 min). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsInclusion criteria included couples with one to two prior early PL(s) who self-reported a new pregnancy and were willing to be interviewed together and in English. Couples were interviewed four times: after a positive pregnancy test and once in each trimester. Interviews were transcribed and data were analysed using thematic analysis to compare and contrast needs of the couples at each of the four time periods in the pregnancy and across the entire pregnancy. One same-sex couple and 14 heterosexual couples participated. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Couples' needs were categorized into two main longitudinal themes across the pregnancy, divided by the 20-week scan. Within each longitudinal theme, there were two themes to represent each time period. In the longitudinal theme ' LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Participants were self-selected from an ongoing cohort study of patients presenting at hospital with PL. Single women were not included in the study. This study was limited to data collection in Denmark; however, other countries with public healthcare systems may have similar offerings with regard to their provision of antenatal care, care provided in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) clinics and the availability of private scans. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe findings underscore that an early PL creates an increased need for monitoring and care in a subsequent pregnancy. This study highlights a gap in pregnancy care for those with a history of PL given that their need for monitoring and support is high in the early weeks of a new pregnancy before they have access to antenatal care, and before they have had multiple PLs and can be referred to the RPL unit. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 101028172 for E.K. The Copenhagen Pregnancy Loss Cohort is funded by a grant from the BioInnovation Institute Foundation. H.S.N. has received scientific grants from Freya Biosciences, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, BioInnovation Institute, Ministry of Education, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Augustinus Fonden, Oda og Hans Svenningsens Fond, Demant Fonden, Ole Kirks Fond, and Independent Research Fund Denmark. H.S.N. received personal payment or honoraria for lectures and presentations from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Astra Zeneca, Cook Medical, Gedeon Richter, and Ibsa Nordic. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Indexed as

early pregnancy losslongitudinal studypregnancypregnancy carepsychosocial factors

Identifiers

PMID37577178
PMCPMC10412407
OpenAlexW4385446775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.