ArticleMethodsX2023
A micro-flow, high-pH, reversed-phase peptide fractionation and collection system for targeted and in-depth proteomics of low-abundance proteins in limiting samples.
Article in MethodsX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolomic and proteomic differences in susceptible and benzimidazole-resistant adult females and males of Haemonchus contortus.Veterinary research · 2025Article
- Employing complementary fractionation-based N-terminomics approaches enhances the identification of legumain cleavage events in naïve and inflamed colon tissue.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Optimization of glycopeptide enrichment techniques for the identification of clinical biomarkers.Expert review of proteomics · 2024Review
- [Applications of high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in proteomics].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a method and a simple system for high-pH RP-LC peptide fractionation of small sample amounts (30-60 µg), at micro-flow rates with micro-liter fraction collection using ammonium bicarbonate as an optimized buffer for system stability and robustness. The method is applicable to targeted mass spectrometry approaches and to in-depth proteomic studies where the amount of sample is limited. Using targeted proteomics with peptide standards, we present the method's analytical parameters, and potential in increasing the detection of low-abundance proteins that are difficult to quantify with direct targeted or global LC-MS analyses. This fractionation system increased peptide signals by up to 18-fold, while maintaining high quantitative precision, with high fractionation reproducibility across varied sample sets. In real applications, it increased the detection of targeted endogenous peptides by two-fold in a 25 cell-cycle-control protein panel, and in-depth MS analyses of nuclear extracts, it allowed the detection of up to 8,896 proteins with 138,417 peptides in 24-concatenated fractions compared to 3,344 proteins with 23,093 peptides without fractionation. In a relevant biological problem of CDK4/6-inhibitors and breast cancer, the method reproduced known information and revealed novel insights, highlighting that it can be successfully applied in studies involving low-abundance proteins and limited samples. •Tested nine high-pH buffer/solvent systems to obtain a robust, effective, and reproducible micro-flow fractionation method which was devoid of commonly encountered LC clogging/pressure issues after months of use.•Peptide enrichment method to improve detection and quantitation of low-abundance proteins in targeted and in-depth proteomic studies.•Can be applied to diverse protein samples where the available amount is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.