Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37577143›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Differing Professional Perspectives on the Interprofessional Collaboration in IPUs: A Mixed-methods Study.

Dorine J van Staalduinen, Petra E A van den Bekerom, Sandra M Groeneveld, Arie Franx, Anne M Stiggelbout, M Elske van den Akker-van Marle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dorine J van StaalduinenMedical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6510-6605
Petra E A van den BekeromInstitute of Public Administration, Leiden University, Turfmarkt 99, 2511 DP, Den Haag, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0299-5657
Sandra M GroeneveldInstitute of Public Administration, Leiden University, Turfmarkt 99, 2511 DP, Den Haag, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6736-1447
Arie FranxErasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8801-5546
Anne M StiggelboutMedical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6293-4509
M Elske van den Akker-van MarleMedical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5269-509X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: An important aspect of Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) is providing the full cycle of care for a specific medical condition through interprofessional collaboration. This requires employees from diverse professional backgrounds to interact, but there is limited knowledge on how professionals perceive such interprofessional collaboration. We aimed to provide insight into how different professionals perceive Integrated Practice Unit (IPU) composition and what factors influence the quality of interprofessional collaboration within IPUs. Methods: A survey was administered to employees from different professional backgrounds (medical specialists, nurses, allied health professionals, administrative employees) working in IPUs to assess their perception of the composition of their IPU and the quality of the interactions. Subsequently, semi-structured interviews were conducted to gain a deeper understanding of the findings of the survey. Results: Medical specialists and nurses were most frequently considered to be part of an IPU and indicated that they have high quality interactions. Allied health professionals were less often considered part of the team by all other professional groups and all report low quality interaction with this group. The extent to which a professional group is perceived as a team member depends on their visibility, involvement in the treatment of the patient, and shared interest. Differences in the quality of interprofessional collaboration are influenced by organizational structures, knowledge of each other's expertise, and by ways of communication. Conclusions: In VBHC, there seems to be a lack of common perception of an IPU's composition and a failure to always achieve high quality interprofessional collaboration. Given the importance of interprofessional collaboration in VBHC, effort should be invested in achieving a shared understanding and improved collaboration.

Indexed as

Integrated Practice Unitintegration of careinterprofessional collaborationprofessional interactionteam membershipteamworkvalue-based healthcare

Identifiers

PMID37577143
PMCPMC10418149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.