Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37577103›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2023

Injectable fillers: current status, physicochemical properties, function mechanism, and perspectives.

Jiahong Guo, Wei Fang, Feifei Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Conditions to Consider When Choosing Fillers.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Analysis of Filler Spread: Facial Retinacula Play a Prominent Role.Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2026
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiahong GuoYunnan Botanee Bio-technology Group Co., Ltd. Yunnan 650106 China wangfeifei@winona.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9188-2242
Wei FangYunnan Yunke Characteristic Plant Extraction Laboratory Co., Ltd. Yunnan 650106 China.
Feifei WangYunnan Botanee Bio-technology Group Co., Ltd. Yunnan 650106 China wangfeifei@winona.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing understanding of the aging process and growing desire for minimally invasive treatments, injectable fillers have great potential for correcting and rejuvenating facial wrinkles/folds and contouring the face. However, considering the increasing availability of multiple soft tissue fillers, it is important to understand their inherent biophysical features and specific mechanism. Thus, in this review, we aim to provide an update on the current injectable filler products and analyze and compare their critical physicochemical properties and function mechanisms for volume-filling. Additionally, future trends and development processes for injectable fillers are also proposed.

Identifiers

PMID37577103
PMCPMC10413051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.