Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37577010›Full record

ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2023

Preoperative MRI accuracy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Anca-Raluca Popiţa, Adriana Rusu, Valentin Muntean, Patriciu Achimas Cadariu, Alexandru Irimie, Cosmin Lisencu, Bogdan Pop, Liliana Resiga, Zsolt Fekete, Radu Badea

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anca-Raluca Popiţa"Ion Chiricuţă" Oncology Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Adriana RusuDiabetes and Nutrition Diseases Department, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Valentin MunteanSurgery Department, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Patriciu Achimas Cadariu"Ion Chiricuţă" Oncology Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Alexandru Irimie"Ion Chiricuţă" Oncology Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Cosmin Lisencu"Ion Chiricuţă" Oncology Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Bogdan Pop"Ion Chiricuţă" Oncology Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Liliana Resiga"Ion Chiricuţă" Oncology Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Zsolt Fekete"Ion Chiricuţă" Oncology Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Radu BadeaMedical Imaging Department, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: To evaluate the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in restaging locally advanced rectal cancers (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), with pathologic correlation. Methods: 80 patients with LARC treated with neoadjuvant therapy, with restaging MRI and surgery, were enrolled and prospectively reviewed. The diagnostic accuracy of the restaging MRI was assessed for tumor (ymrT), nodal status (ymrN), circumferential resection margin (ymrCRM), extramural vascular invasion (ymrEMVI) and tumoral deposits (ymrN1c) by calculating the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), negative predictive values (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV). Response to treatment was classified as good response (complete/near complete) vs. poor response (poor/partial response). The agreement between the tumor regression grade at MRI (mrTRG) and pathology (pTRG) was reported, as well the performance of mrTRG to identify good responders. The correlation between restaging MRI and histopathology was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. Results: The MRI accuracy ranged between 63.8% and 92.5% for T stage and was 81.3% for N stage. All MRI parameters evaluated at restaging were statistically significant correlated with histopathology evaluation, but EMVI. There was moderate correlation for N and N1c and a positive strong correlation for T, CRM and TRG (Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.390 for mrN1c-pN1c, 0.428 for mrN-pN, 0.522 for mrCRM-pCRM, 0.550 for mrT-pT and 0.731 for mrTRG-pTRG). Diagnostic accuracy of anal sphincter invasion was 91.3%, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. Accuracy rate varied between 70% for partial response to 93.75% for complete response after nCRT. Conclusions: MR imaging had good accuracy in restaging LARCs after nCRT. Our results showed high MRI accuracy in detecting anal sphincter involvement for low rectal tumors, with high NPV to exclude tumoral invasion. Restaging MRI predicted well the tumor regression grade, with good diagnostic performance in differentiating good responders from poor/partial responders. The accuracy was high for detecting complete response.

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imagingneoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyrectal neoplasmstumor response

Identifiers

PMID37577010
PMCPMC10419690
OpenAlexW4285594819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.