Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37576946›Full record

ArticlePhysical review research

Inferring couplings in networks across order-disorder phase transitions.

Vudtiwat Ngampruetikorn, Vedant Sachdeva, Johanna Torrence, Jan Humplik, David J Schwab, Stephanie E Palmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vudtiwat NgampruetikornInitiative for the Theoretical Sciences, The Graduate Center, CUNY, New York, New York 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8548-3029
Vedant SachdevaDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy and Department of Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Johanna TorrenceDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy and Department of Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6913-6649
Jan HumplikInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
David J SchwabInitiative for the Theoretical Sciences, The Graduate Center, CUNY, New York, New York 10016, USA.
Stephanie E PalmerDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy and Department of Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6211-6293

Funding

Coarse-graining approaches to networks, learning, and behaviorR01EB026943 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BIALEK, WILLIAM, PALMER, STEPHANIE E · 2018 to 2020
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical inference is central to many scientific endeavors, yet how it works remains unresolved. Answering this requires a quantitative understanding of the intrinsic interplay between statistical models, inference methods, and the structure in the data. To this end, we characterize the efficacy of direct coupling analysis (DCA) - a highly successful method for analyzing amino acid sequence data-in inferring pairwise interactions from samples of ferromagnetic Ising models on random graphs. Our approach allows for physically motivated exploration of qualitatively distinct data regimes separated by phase transitions. We show that inference quality depends strongly on the nature of data-generating distributions: optimal accuracy occurs at an intermediate temperature where the detrimental effects from macroscopic order and thermal noise are minimal. Importantly our results indicate that DCA does not always outperform its local-statistics-based predecessors; while DCA excels at low temperatures, it becomes inferior to simple correlation thresholding at virtually all temperatures when data are limited. Our findings offer insights into the regime in which DCA operates so successfully, and more broadly, how inference interacts with the structure in the data.

Identifiers

PMID37576946
PMCPMC10421637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.