Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37576903›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Case Report: Analysis of four cases of metastatic bladder masses after radical prostatectomy.

Hao Wang, Dawei Xie, Jun Lu, Yifan Chu, Siqi Wang, Peng Qiao, Liyang Wu, Jianwen Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 78% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hao WangDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Dawei XieDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jun LuDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yifan ChuDepartment of Urology, Beijing Daxing District People's Hospital, Beijiing, China.
Siqi WangDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Peng QiaoDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Liyang WuDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jianwen WangDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Chao-Yang Hospital · CNShaoxing People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical characteristics and diagnostic and therapeutic methods of bladder metastasis after radical prostatectomy and to improve its diagnosis and treatment. Methods: The clinical data of four patients with bladder metastasis after radical prostatectomy were retrospectively analyzed from January 2011 to December 2021. Three cases suffered from intermittent gross hematuria, and only one case was found to have an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor was performed in four cases, in which one case also underwent resection of urethral mass. Three cases received endocrine therapy, one of which added intravesical instillation and radiation therapy. Another case received chemotherapy based on comprehensive treatment. Results: According to the pathological and immunohistochemical results, three cases were acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score of 9, and all cases were PSA positive and negative for cytokeratin 7 (CK7) and GATA binding protein 3 (GATA-3). One case was small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the prostate and was positive for chromogranin A (CGA), synaptophysin (SYN), and cluster of differentiation 56 (CD56). During the follow-up period of 4 to 13 months, one case was lost to follow-up and three cases were alive. Conclusion: Bladder metastasis after radical prostatectomy is rare, and pathology combined with immunohistochemistry is the gold standard for its diagnosis. Pathological type determines its treatment. Systemic treatment is essential, and local treatment is the most palliative means. Early diagnosis and treatment is significant for better prognosis.

Indexed as

bladder metastasisdiagnosisprognosisprostate cancerradical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID37576903
PMCPMC10417713
OpenAlexW4385340968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.