Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37576889›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Salvage lenvatinib/everolimus combination therapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor and VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Christopher Kwok, Adam Khorasanchi, Sarah P Psutka, Megan Hinkley, Shawn Dason, Debasish Sundi, Yuanquan Yang, Yajing Yang, Claire Verschraegen, Evan E Gross and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher KwokDepartment of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Adam KhorasanchiDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Sarah P PsutkaDepartment of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
Megan HinkleyDepartment of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Shawn DasonDivision of Urologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Debasish SundiDivision of Urologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Yuanquan YangDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Yajing YangDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Claire VerschraegenDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Evan E GrossThe University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Delaney OrcuttThe University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Ming YinDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
The Ohio State University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The optimal treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients who have progressed after both immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) remains uncertain. Lenvatinib and everolimus (LE) are frequently used in combination as salvage therapy because of their different antitumor mechanisms, but efficacy and toxicity data in this setting are lacking. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts from two academic centers for 71 adult mRCC patients who received LE after prior ICI and TKI exposure. We evaluated patient demographics, histology, International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group, treatment history, and toxicity details. Outcomes of interest included objective response rate (ORR), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), ≥grade 3 toxicities, and schedule or dosage changes, which were evaluated using descriptive statistics, chi-square test, Cox proportional hazards model, and the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The median age was 64 (range 31-84). Most patients had clear cell histology (84.5%) and had undergone nephrectomy (80.3%). IMDC risks were favorable (19.7%), intermediate (int) (66.2%), poor (11.3%), and unknown (2.8%). The average ORR was 26.8%, while the median TTF was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5-7.6) and the median OS was 9 months (95% CI, 7.6-12.9). Intermediate and poor IMDC risks were independently associated with a significantly worse TTF compared to favorable risk (hazard ratio (HR), 3.03, 95% CI, 1.18-7.79), as was ≥4L treatment Conclusions: LE therapy is feasible but has modest efficacies following ICI/TKI treatment. Patients with favorable risk or treated earlier may have a better treatment response. These observations need to be confirmed in prospective studies.

Indexed as

everolimusimmune checkpoint inhibitorlenvatinibrenal cell carcinomaretrospective reviewVEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID37576889
PMCPMC10412983
OpenAlexW4385304169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.