Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37576885›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2023

Diagnostic value of deep learning-assisted endoscopic ultrasound for pancreatic tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bing Lv, Kunhong Wang, Ning Wei, Feng Yu, Tao Tao, Yanting Shi

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Imaging: A Systematic Review.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bing LvSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, Shandong, China.
Kunhong WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo, Shandong, China.
Ning WeiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo, Shandong, China.
Feng YuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo, Shandong, China.
Tao TaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo, Shandong, China.
Yanting ShiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo, Shandong, China.
Central Hospital of Zibo · CNShandong University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is commonly utilized in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors, although as this modality relies primarily on the practitioner's visual judgment, it is prone to result in a missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis due to inexperience, fatigue, or distraction. Deep learning (DL) techniques, which can be used to automatically extract detailed imaging features from images, have been increasingly beneficial in the field of medical image-based assisted diagnosis. The present systematic review included a meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the accuracy of DL-assisted EUS for the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors diagnosis. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search for all studies relevant to EUS and DL in the following four databases, from their inception through February 2023: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Target studies were strictly screened based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, after which we performed a meta-analysis using Stata 16.0 to assess the diagnostic ability of DL and compare it with that of EUS practitioners. Any sources of heterogeneity were explored using subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Results: A total of 10 studies, involving 3,529 patients and 34,773 training images, were included in the present meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87-96%), the pooled specificity was 95% (95% CI, 89-98%), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99). Conclusion: DL-assisted EUS has a high accuracy and clinical applicability for diagnosing pancreatic tumors. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023391853, identifier CRD42023391853.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningendoscopic ultrasoundmeta-analysispancreatic tumorsystemic review

Identifiers

PMID37576885
PMCPMC10414790
OpenAlexW4385293132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.